• Competitor rules

    Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.

Pentium G3258 Overclock - Cooling Required?

Soldato
Joined
29 Dec 2009
Posts
7,246
I've no experience with this CPU but from what I hear they will easily do 4.5GHz ?

What sort of CPU cooler would be required for either.
4GHz
4.5GHz ?

The reason I ask is because I recently did a 4690k build for a friend on a stock cooler, OC'd to 4.3ish and it doesn't go above 70 on the stock cooler at 100% load..

Thanks :)
 
Last edited:
Absolutely no need for a 3rd party cooler but not all are equal. My last one only did 4GHz and it took 1.27v to get there.
 
For a £50 CPU, the benchmark figures in games look great.

Primary use is ARMA 3 anyway so a high-Hz dual core is fine I reckon.

I'll find out tomorrow, ordered a couple earlier :)

Might do some benchmarks too, with a 960 and a 980.
 
Last edited:
For a £50 CPU, the benchmark figures in games look great.

Primary use is ARMA 3 anyway so a high-Hz dual core is fine I reckon.

I'll find out tomorrow, ordered a couple earlier :)

Might do some benchmarks too, with a 960 and a 980.

Will be great to know what you think as well i am stuck between the G3258 and the I3 6100
 
They are decent but will struggle in many a game to keep smooth frames.
Arma 3 is way better on my i5 750 @4ghz than my old g3258 @4.5
 
They are decent but will struggle in many a game to keep smooth frames.
Arma 3 is way better on my i5 750 @4ghz than my old g3258 @4.5

I think i might look into A10 7800 build it might be better for me i just didn't really want a dead socket.
Would be nice to be able to try ready built computers that have the cpu in that you are thinking of buying at the time then you can get a feel for how good or bad they are.
 
i just sold an i3 6100, it did an exsy 4.2Ghz and run fallout 4 on max setting no problem
when i had a G3258 at 4.1 it was a dog for gaming, and made the experience very unpleasant with all the lag. the stock speed i3 4150 my son used to use was better then an overclocked G3258

if your gaming at 1080p the i3 is king bang for buck
 
From my experience for the price its a great little cpu and does overclock very well think I had 4.6-4.8 out of it, but for gaming look elsewhere as it cause a lot of stutters in games and quite afew crashes at 100% load
 
Going back to the original question - I recently built my Dad a machine with a G3258 OC'd to 4.3, I used a Scythe Big Shuriken as it's a small ITX build, it clocked to 4.5 no problem but for better day-to-day temps I settled at 4.3 for him.

The mobo wouldn't allow adaptive voltage so it probably runs a bit hotter than it would in a decent board, but it's still more than comfortable and is plenty quick enough for him.
 
So is the i3 worth the extra £50 for the extra threads some people i have asked have said its not.

Maybe, but the i3 still a dual core chip at the end of the day.

Having the ability to run 4 threads is better than nothing, but the performance hyperthreading brings can't compare to the performance of a quad core chip and software is becoming more about parallel performance everyday.
 
Back
Top Bottom