Soldato
- Joined
- 23 Oct 2002
- Posts
- 2,562
- Location
- Edinburgh/Southampton
My boss kindly paid for a lawyer to investigate for me.
The reply was:
I don't accept the advice on the website about Mawdesley v Chief Constable of Cheshire. If the person has actually read the case properly, he would have noted that Mr Justice Owen rejected the argument that a person needed to be cautioned under para 10.1 of PACE and he indicated that an argument advanced to exclude a written confession would not have succeeded. In other words, the form of words advocated by the website is a load of tosh.
So make up your own minds........
The reply was:
I don't accept the advice on the website about Mawdesley v Chief Constable of Cheshire. If the person has actually read the case properly, he would have noted that Mr Justice Owen rejected the argument that a person needed to be cautioned under para 10.1 of PACE and he indicated that an argument advanced to exclude a written confession would not have succeeded. In other words, the form of words advocated by the website is a load of tosh.
So make up your own minds........