Associate
- Joined
- 15 Apr 2013
- Posts
- 14
- Location
- Ireland
;Guys\Girls,
My gaming rig was built in '08 and I'm upgrading (done every 4/5 years over time). Everything is built myself and budget is always tight being around £200ish for gpu. I'm still using q6600\P5q-e o/c to 3.6ghz, normal ddr2 6400 4gb, gtx 460 oc 800\1600\2000, 550w gold psu, sb0350 modded for dolby live, windows 8 64 bit (and yes, running great). I never get over 85-90% cpu usage in any game even modern at high\very high settings with low\no aa settings at 1920x1080 or 1920x1200 and 100% gpu usage so no bottleneck. Usually in new games i'm getting 30-43fps which is ok. My plan over next 1 1\2 years is to
1:upgrade gpu to modern now for gaming fps improvement (if even slight)
2:enjoy 60fps'ish normally with possibility of surround gaming if over 25-30fps (X3)
3:upgrade mobo\ram\cpu as haswell established solid (over next year)
4:repeat in 4 odd years.
This is all fine, though here's the problem, no one can agree all over the net if a hd7950 3gb, a newer tech 660ti would be more suitable, then somebody suggests something else! It goes memory bandwidth issues, physx support (which i do like), 3gb vs 2gb, lack of cuda on radeon cards, micro-stuttering problems, lack of direct compute on nvidia cards, but this is causing mega confusion and I don't know what to do! All I want is around 60fps at 1080p normal (crysis,battlefield,witcher 2,batman etc) with option of 20-30fps surround. I do like high aa but its not a deal breaker. I've never seen a more confusing time for gpus and I've been gaming sine the 80's! Please help!!
My gaming rig was built in '08 and I'm upgrading (done every 4/5 years over time). Everything is built myself and budget is always tight being around £200ish for gpu. I'm still using q6600\P5q-e o/c to 3.6ghz, normal ddr2 6400 4gb, gtx 460 oc 800\1600\2000, 550w gold psu, sb0350 modded for dolby live, windows 8 64 bit (and yes, running great). I never get over 85-90% cpu usage in any game even modern at high\very high settings with low\no aa settings at 1920x1080 or 1920x1200 and 100% gpu usage so no bottleneck. Usually in new games i'm getting 30-43fps which is ok. My plan over next 1 1\2 years is to
1:upgrade gpu to modern now for gaming fps improvement (if even slight)
2:enjoy 60fps'ish normally with possibility of surround gaming if over 25-30fps (X3)
3:upgrade mobo\ram\cpu as haswell established solid (over next year)
4:repeat in 4 odd years.
This is all fine, though here's the problem, no one can agree all over the net if a hd7950 3gb, a newer tech 660ti would be more suitable, then somebody suggests something else! It goes memory bandwidth issues, physx support (which i do like), 3gb vs 2gb, lack of cuda on radeon cards, micro-stuttering problems, lack of direct compute on nvidia cards, but this is causing mega confusion and I don't know what to do! All I want is around 60fps at 1080p normal (crysis,battlefield,witcher 2,batman etc) with option of 20-30fps surround. I do like high aa but its not a deal breaker. I've never seen a more confusing time for gpus and I've been gaming sine the 80's! Please help!!