pokemon arceus?

Associate
Joined
17 Jan 2016
Posts
1,945
Location
isle of wight
Not sure about this game, is it any good? reviews seem mixed and dont know if i should buy it or not, i have pokemon sword which im enjoying although havent completed yet.

What do you guys think of arceus? are you enjoying it and would you say its better than sword for you?

All input on this game is welcomed :)
 
Not sure about this game, is it any good? reviews seem mixed and dont know if i should buy it or not, i have pokemon sword which im enjoying although havent completed yet.

What do you guys think of arceus? are you enjoying it and would you say its better than sword for you?

All input on this game is welcomed :)

It’s the first Pokémon worth buying since Black/White. It’s unrefined but a step in the right direction for the franchise.
 
It's the pokemon game people have been wanting for years. It's not pretty in the slightest even for a switch game, but it is fun. One day GF will put some effort in to games and this style could be the future.
 
Thanks for input, mmmmm might pick it up then when i finally complete sword
 
Basically what the above guys said; its not true open world, its (LARGE) Zones ala Monster Hunter (but bigger); with a central hub 'city'.
Graphically it's got art direction and style, but technically it's a bit ropey; although framerate is at least more consistent than Sword/Shield, without the drops those had.

It's a step forward for the series; and honestly if they go this route, with more cities or work on merging into a single large zone, this seems the way forward for the series.

It's not perfect, but it is genuinely a proper step towards the open-world Pokemon game people have wanted for years.
 
Basically what the above guys said; its not true open world, its (LARGE) Zones ala Monster Hunter (but bigger); with a central hub 'city'.
Graphically it's got art direction and style, but technically it's a bit ropey; although framerate is at least more consistent than Sword/Shield, without the drops those had.

It's a step forward for the series; and honestly if they go this route, with more cities or work on merging into a single large zone, this seems the way forward for the series.

It's not perfect, but it is genuinely a proper step towards the open-world Pokemon game people have wanted for years.
Thanks for input, sword is actually my first pokemon game, never thought i would enjoy them so never tried one until sword, loving it though, im only at the fire gym at the moment so got quite some way to go.

Think i will defo pick arceus up soon though as most people seem to think its better gameplay wise than sword
 
Think i will defo pick arceus up soon though as most people seem to think its better gameplay wise than sword

Sw/Sh is a terrible Pokemon game. This is far better.

Maybe if it's your first Pokemon it's fine but the original Red/Blue are better than 90% of the mainline games that came afterwards.
 
Sw/Sh is a terrible Pokemon game. This is far better.

Maybe if it's your first Pokemon it's fine but the original Red/Blue are better than 90% of the mainline games that came afterwards.
Cool, should defo like arceus then if its better than sword as im actually loving playing it lol

Thanks for the input :)
 
Yeah, Sword and Shield had some good ideas, and at times it's even pretty; but it is SO formulaic/by the numbers, and feels essentially like they ran out of time developing it, and half the content got shelved. It really does nothing much that new, and it's a shame as there was potential there and some charm, the core pokemon experience (as you've discovered) is still fun, but realistically it's not giving you a much improved experience over older titles which is part of the reason it's got so much flak, it's really not the step forward it should or could have been, and feels lazy. It was the first generation ground-up designed to be run on a hybrid portable/TV console (Let's Go doesn't count as it was a remake), with the much increased power over older systems, and it doesn't really do that much with it; at least not compared to what people wanted and hoped for. Although let's not even get started on the Diamond/Pearl remakes; which basically appear to have been done on the cheap lol
Arguably, Arceus is closer to the experience people expected/felt they would get with the move to home consoles with Sword and Shield, but didn't deliver on.

That said if you've not experienced any others; I'd genuinely recommend picking up Let's Go Pikachu/Eevee, as its a revamped remaster essentially of the original Red/Blue, with some Pokemon Go-esque elements fused in to cater to the how mentally popular Pokemon GO was ~5 years ago, and some tweaks to the story, character you play as etc. Very very charming, the original music reorchestrated is still fantastic, and if you're enjoying SW/SH, you'll probably like it; especially as you could argue it's a more 'pure' experience being based on Gen 1; also with some enjoyable tweaks like seeing your partner walking with you, and also seeing wild pokemon in the field, rather than just in limited areas ala Sw/Sh. Given the fact it's a decent few years old now; I'd expect it'd be possible to find a copy at a pretty reasonable price. :)

Arceus is barebones in places; and the visuals are lacking a lot of polish (although the art style etc itself is fine), but it's genuinely a much more open game, introduces new crafting ideas/components, the 'areas' are pretty large; albeit without the Gyms/multiple towns we're used to etc etc, and really brings back the feeling of being in an unknown 'pokemon world'.

Arguably it's a prototype of where things should go though with the core games though gameplay-wise, with more work on adding things that are missing, such as multiple towns/fully fleshed out regions etc, and moving ever closer to a true open world.

Realistically at this point; if GameFreak had invested in larger teams, longer turnarounds and more quality; we've realistically got enough regions and area to have a genuine open-world, "Pokemon World" game, but I'm not expecting anything so grandiose any time soon; as it is Arceus feels like the first real step they've taken towards such an open world concept in years.

Hell, freaking Pokemon Gold/Silver, 20 YEARS ago, featured 2 complete regions; a new specific region to that title, and a tweaked version of the original region you could revisit after you passed a late game story point!
 
Last edited:
Yeah, Sword and Shield had some good ideas, and at times it's even pretty; but it is SO Formulaic/by the numbers, and feels essentially like they ran out of time developing it, and half the content got shelved. It really does nothing much that new, and it's a shame as there was potential there and some charm, the core pokemon experience (as you've discovered) is still fun, but realistically it's not giving you a much improved experience over older titles which is part of the reason it's got so much flak, it's really not the step forward it should or could have been, and feel's lazy. Although let's not even get started on the Diamond/Pearl remakes; which basically appear to have been done on the cheap lol

That said if you've not experienced any others; I'd recommend picking up Let's Go Pikachu/Eevee, as its a revamped remaster essentially of the original Red/Blue, with some Pokemon Go-esque elements fused in to cater to the how mentally popular Pokemon GO was ~5 years ago, and some tweaks to the story, character you play as etc. Very very charming, and if you're enjoying SW/SH, you'll probably like it; especially as you could argue it's a more 'pure' experience being based on Gen 1; also with some enjoyable tweaks like seeing your partner walking with you, and also seeing wild pokemon in the field, rather than just in limited areas ala Sw/Sh.

Arceus is barebones in places; and the visuals are lacking a lot of polish (although the art style etc itself is fine), but it's genuinely a much more open game, the 'areas' are pretty large; albeit without the Gyms/multiple towns we're used to. Arguably it's a prototype of where things should go though with the core games though gameplay-wise, with more work on adding things that are missing, such as towns etc, and moving ever closer to a true open world.
Thanks for input, will maybe give pikachu a go at some point, although i really do have a itch to try arceus :)
 
I'd maybe be tempted to say Pokemon Let's Go first, just to appreciate a wider range of pokemon and series traditions (for example certain musical motifs) etc (ignoring the revamped capture mechanics etc), but I can't blame you for wanting to leap at Arceus.
 
Back
Top Bottom