Polarising filter cracked - replace?

Man of Honour
Joined
18 Oct 2002
Posts
8,517
Location
West Coast of Scotland
I've been using a filter with a 12-24 on my Nikon D7000. Unfortunately it was dropped and cracked on holiday in Tunisia so I didn't get to use it. However, I haven't really noticed a huge difference in the kind of photos I take. Do they really make a big difference, particularly in bright conditions? I'm off to Turkey soon and I intend to take loads of photos. If so, can you recommend a reasonably priced replacement?
 
They do make a difference as you can't replicate their effect in post production

You can deepen blues etc with software but removing glare from water or clouds ,etc isn't possible

I tend to carry one but use it depending on what I'm shooting
 
They increase clarity by reducing glare. If you have been shooting in sunny conditions and haven't noticed a difference, then I guess there is no need to worry about it.

Is it he Nikon 12-24 you're using?
 
You've also discovered the other primary purpose of a polarising filter. To protect the much more expensive lens from accidental bumps and dings.
 
They make a huge differences that you can never replicate in software: reduce glare, increase saturation and contrast, darken blue skies, remove and reduce reflections.

You can see the difference just by rotating the filter.

I have CPLs permanently glued to most of my lenses!
 
If it's not a linier polarizer why does rotating it make any difference?

Rotating changes the angle of the polarizing film allowing you to increase or decrease the effect. The degree of polarization depends on the sun's azimuth and the angle of the camera/lens so you need to control how much filtering takes place. You don't want to over do it because then you can end up with very dark skies, colour shifts and unnatural hues.

Edit: the actual physics is somewhat complex:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Photon_polarization

As a simplification you can imagine light coming from the sun has polarization in both a vertical and horizontal plane: - and | giving +
When light is reflected off a surface like a glass window or leaves then it is polarized in a single axis, e.g. |
The CPL allows you to control which angle the polarized light can pass through the filter, e.g. if the filter is rotated to this "-" position only light aligned like "-" can enter, vice versa for like in the vertical plane | or angle other angle / \ etc.

If light is reflecting off the window in the vertical plane | then you rotate the angle of the filter to horizontal - and none of the reflected light will pass through, only background light that is also horizontal. Any background light that is vertical will also be blocked, which is why you loose 1 stop of light at least.

If you rotated the filter to be at 45degrees then any vertical or horizontal aligned photons will be clocked with a 50% probability.


A CPL is actually a device that control the quantum mechanical state of photons.

By the way, the same kind of concept is used for quantum cryptography. Imagine you have a box that can hold a single photon, you polarize the photon to be in the vertical/horizontal or one of the diagonal planes. If you have done the polarization then you know what angle filter to use to guarantee the photon can escape the box. However, stranger has no way of finding out because if the photon was say vertically aligned then if they chose a vertical alignment and detected the photon emission then all they can know is that the polarization was not horizontal, because the polarization could be either of the diagonals both with a 50% probability, or vertical. String together 8 or so of these boxes and the odds of someone getting the right combo is remote.
 
Last edited:
Thanks very much for the in-depth replies. I've decided that I will invest in a replacement. I will be shooting a lot of outdoor stuff, with the potential for lots of glare. So can you recommend something? I've always been a little suspicious of filters. Apparently the one I had was £100 new :( (I got it secondhand along with the lens, which is Tokina)
 
I use B&W F-pro filters and have never had an issue.

I had some old Hoyas (super MRC I think) but they weren't very nice with a brown colour cast. I purchased a hoya HD CPL but it smashed with a tiny knock on the first day (never even left the house with it). I had a Tiffen UV get the threads cross and basicall ruin my 18-70mm f/4.5.

My B&W filters have been flawless in comparison.
Saying that I got some free filters from B&H photo with a lens I bought and I find them quite nice, no colour shift and no issues so far. And my wife uses a Hoya Pro digital which seems fine as well.
 
Last edited:
If you want good bang for your buck look at the Marumi dhg or dhg super range they review really well and I've had a couple and can't fault them.
 
Back
Top Bottom