Poll: POLL: Do you agree with Jeremy Clarkson's Sacking?

Do you agree with Jeremy Clarkson's sacking?

  • Yes

    Votes: 778 70.1%
  • No

    Votes: 332 29.9%

  • Total voters
    1,110
Status
Not open for further replies.
I'd be interested to see the results of this, so even though there's another thread I'll make it a poll as it wouldn't work in the other thread now.
 
Yes. He assaulted someone. He threw a bitch fit over not getting a hot meal and assaulted someone. Let that sink in for a few before the same lot who defended him in the other thread chime in. Had it been anyone else, they'd be singing a different tune.
 
Yes. He assaulted someone. He threw a bitch fit over not getting a hot meal and assaulted someone. Let that sink in for a few before the same lot who defended him in the other thread chime in. Had it been anyone else, they'd be singing a different tune.
******** To be fair, i'm sick of this prissy, over protective, soft society we have, not enough beef is sorted over a little fisticuffs, i genuinely dont see the issue, the producer shouldnt have been such a walkover in the first place.
 
Yes. He assaulted someone. He threw a bitch fit over not getting a hot meal and assaulted someone. Let that sink in for a few before the same lot who defended him in the other thread chime in. Had it been anyone else, they'd be singing a different tune.

They should kick Stephen Fry out for doing cocaine on the premises as well then.
 
******** To be fair, i'm sick of this prissy, over protective, soft society we have, not enough beef is sorted over a little fisticuffs, i genuinely dont see the issue, the producer shouldnt have been such a walkover in the first place.

Nonsense. Had it been anyone else, you'd have been singing a different tune. It's simply because Jeremy Clarkson is the spokesperson for the "ELF AND SAFETY GONE MAD, RULE BRITANNIA, I'M NOT RACIST BUT..." crowd that he has such support on these forums, because there's a seedy under current of such on these forums.

They should kick Stephen Fry out for doing cocaine on the premises as well then.

What's that got to do with the price of rice? Absolute nothing. Or are we just bringing up random **** that occurred at the BBC to try and deflect attention away from what Clarkson did as immature, childish, and a criminal offence? Hell, why don't we dig up the corpse of Saville while we're at it so Clarkson supporters can point to it and say "LOOK AT THIS! HE WASN'T AS BAD AS THIS!".
 
What's that got to do with the price of rice? Absolute nothing. Or are we just bringing up random **** that occurred at the BBC to try and deflect attention away from what Clarkson did as immature, childish, and a criminal offence? Hell, why don't we dig up the corpse of Saville while we're at it so Clarkson supporters can point to it and say "LOOK AT THIS! HE WASN'T AS BAD AS THIS!".

Because it seems to be one rule for one and one for another....which is exactly the argument that people who think he should be sacked keep putting forward...

Why is Clarkson being singled out and sacked for breaking the law, whilst Mr Fry is not?

Be mindful that I did not say what others have done absolves Clarkson of his sins. I just think others that have committed discretions of similar severity should be treated the same and given the same level of punishment (ie sacked/ be let go)
 
Last edited:
Absolutely not nonsense, the fact that it was JC, admittedly i'm more interested in the situation, but regardless who it was i'd still have the same veiwpoint.
Nonsense. Had it been anyone else, you'd have been singing a different tune. It's simply because Jeremy Clarkson is the spokesperson for the "ELF AND SAFETY GONE MAD, RULE BRITANNIA, I'M NOT RACIST BUT..." crowd that he has such support on these forums, because there's a seedy under current of such on these forums.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom