• Competitor rules

    Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.

Poor Performance from a goof setup..

Associate
Joined
28 Dec 2008
Posts
27
Hey boys and girls

Built a new pc

Specs are as follows

Intel Qcore 6600 2.4Ghz
ASUS ATI 4870 DDR5 512mb PCI-e
X48T-DQ6 Motherboard
2Gb DDR3 1000mhz
800Watt powersupply
Windows Vista Home

All my drivers are updated.


Seem to only get 150 FPS max.. :S

On Counterstrike source.

Yes i have uncapped the FPS to 300 as well.

My brother also has a PC it cost him 600£

Mine was just over 900£.

He runs at 300fps constant :S

on x2 9600's

Being a noob, i dont know if them to cards are better than mine.

Any idea what my problem might be :S ?

Thanks

Wes.
 
must say it does seem a little low... Spec in sig gets 200+ @ 1680x1050. You can always try putting your q6600 @3ghz which should see a nice improvement in fps.

@ Stock though I think performance should be better.
 
Cod 5 = 100fps, but thats capped.

Crysis = ... Almost unplayable on high. always stopping and starting. like lag spikes.

Ermm.

Cod4 = Fine..

L4D = fine 2.

But for my money i exspect top of the range game to look gawjuss + run fine.. :/
 
to be honest 60fps on CSS is enough, and you should be well aware that no card will play crysis maxed.

You will however need to crank that quad up to 3.0ghz to get things flowing, mind you even at 2.4ghz, 200+ fps should be easily achived.
 
Cod 5 = 100fps, but thats capped.

Crysis = ... Almost unplayable on high. always stopping and starting. like lag spikes.

Ermm.

Cod4 = Fine..

L4D = fine 2.

But for my money i exspect top of the range game to look gawjuss + run fine.. :/

Your top of the range games do play fine. Crysis is just a pig. A very pretty pig that everyone wants to have so others can see how pretty it is. Only trouble is it eats graphics cards and poops low frame rates.
 
CSS is, iirc, cpu dependent. I also have a Q6600 and at stock the fps varies greatly on the map and whether you're inside a building or involved in a really intense fire fight with several players. Try raising it to 3gig. I've had mine up to around 3.4 and the difference is substantial even when comparing it to 3gig. Must admit that I don't get 299fps constantly even when at 3.4, you're bound to take a drop in fps like in the above situations given as an example.
 
that's your problem right there.

God hates you for having a q6600 at stock!

The truth has been revealed. :p

Anyway overclocking the Q6600 is fairly simple, for me... I put the fsb to 333 and that was job done. However my motherboard isn't great, one mhz over 333 and the overclock fails regardless of the voltage (chipset limitation), which in itself is pretty lucky because this board suffers pretty bad vdrop.
 
I just relized the topic name ! :)

:(

guys im such a noob, i dont even get anything from that thread you posted up Vince.

I dont even know were to start :( and i want to overclock this so bad ! :>
 
okay when the machine boots up hit delete, get into the bios and crank up the fsb a little, there are lots of factors and a good read of a "how to" for your board is essential.

hopefully there is somebody out there with the same board that can help you more :D
 
Don't get too caught up with this?

Could be quite a few different things that are playing a factor, if he's running XP and you're running Vista that already gives him a slight performance advantage... Could be a bad driver installation. Either way assuming you use a standard lcd monitor as long as you get a constant 60fps or over I wouldn't even worry about it, measuring how many more frames over what your monitor can display per second is pretty pointless. In other games you will no doubt outperform his machine already.

It is also true that CSS has a cpu bias so you will see improvements by overclocking. I would look into it a bit more, you can achieve a small overclock very fast but to start to squeeze the best out of your cpu will take you time and effort so you have to be prepared to get comfortable with a few things before you can gain an more in depth understanding of how to get a good overclock.

It is more something that takes patience than a vast array of technical knowledge, read the overclocking sticky as suggested. Do you have a g0 stepping q6600? Also is it a recent one? A lot of people seem to have difficulty getting good overclocks out of the recent batches, but you should still be able to see 3-3.2ghz with relative ease.

Personally I am running a q6600 @ 1.4v @ 3.42ghz, I can't seem to get the 3.6 I am after!

Make sure your ram is good enough to support the overclock you are shooting for, with PC6400 (800mhz) you can hit 3.6ghz with a 1:1 ratio (between fsb and ram) assuming your setup will stay stable at this frequency, but even if you do have PC5300 you can overclock to 3ghz quite comfortably. Try raising your fsb to ~333 (you do this in BIOS by hitting the relevent key as suggested).

Don't change values you don't understand as of course you can damage your components (even though it does seem tempting to see what different things do in there!)

Just relax dude and take some time to learn how to overclock. If you are really worried about how your machine is performing, try running some other benchmarks (again check stickies for suggestions, 3d mark etc) and see how you compare to similar setups. If CSS is an anomaly since you already get better than necessary performance, don't worry about it.

Also is he running CSS on the exact same settings, with the same amount of background programs (antivirus etc) at the same resolution? If he has a smaller monitor that already answers this!
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom