Post Your 3DMark2K1/2K3 results here

davetherave2 · 13 Apr 2004 at 05:59

Post Your 3DMark2K1/2K3/2K5 results here

I don't know about any one else here but i regularly click on the 3dmark scores to see what other people have got compared to my own.

So i thought why not create a post where everyone can compare their results in one easy place.

If there is enough results and i am sure there will be, i will put a top 10 of each in this post.

The one stipulation is that links must be provided.

Last Update: 24/08/05 @ 13:32

Sir Random · 13 Apr 2004 at 06:23

Lol, you'll be driven mad editing that table

3DMk01: 21,452
http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k1=7737642

3DMk03: 7067
http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k3=2356182

the.m · 13 Apr 2004 at 08:12

3D 03 7145
http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k3=2045250

3D 01 22781
http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k1=7550469

defmech · 13 Apr 2004 at 08:15

3d MARK 03 = 6205

http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k3=1757957

Duke · 13 Apr 2004 at 08:46

3dmark01: 19075 (http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k1=7533992)

3dmark03: 6593 (http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k3=2060459)

[die]Deadly · 13 Apr 2004 at 10:30

2001: 19221 (memory limits my fsb overclock)
http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k1=7745898
2003: 6463 (80 mm fan added

)
http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k3=2381917

Can go higher on fsb, but the 5:4 ratio seriously decreases scores, plus i don't want to raise cpu voltage due to power demands.

DaZzZa · 13 Apr 2004 at 11:41

in sig

how about a greater challenge a table for each gfx card ?

it could help with the "is my 3dmark score ok" posters

Slyman · 13 Apr 2004 at 12:36

2003 5864
http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k3=2353324

2001 11252 must give more marks for cpu
http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k1=7741317

P4 1.7 @1870 9800pro

JC · 13 Apr 2004 at 12:38

18000 3dmark2001, wont publish as it says i have a duron :rolleyes:

6604 3dmark2003 in sig

speeduk · 13 Apr 2004 at 13:31

Ill post mine when i get my new R420/NV40.

L0rdMike · 13 Apr 2004 at 13:42

Crippled 9800, Softmoded with artifacts Here.

My Ti4200 With CPU overclock Here.

McNutter · 13 Apr 2004 at 16:27

My scores are pish compared to most people these days but here they are anyway:

2001: 17,791
http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k1=7749288

2003: 5,755
http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k3=2373290

9700NP/Barton

Lil old me · 13 Apr 2004 at 16:31

heres mine...

2001
22800

athlon 64 3200 235x10 (1.7v)
kingston kingmax pc3000 5-2-2-2 5:4 (2.8v)
gigabyte k8n non pro
9800se softmodded 432/366
asetec waterchill @ 7v

2003
6585

athlon 64 3200 229x10 (1.7v)
kingston kingmax pc3000 5-2-2-2 5:4 (2.8v)
gigabyte k8n non pro
9800se softmodded 429/369
asetec waterchill @ 7v

FrontSideBus · 13 Apr 2004 at 16:34

01= 15983
03= 5743

Athlon 2400+ @ 180*12
R 9800NP @ 435/650
Soltek SL75 Nforce2400
512mb pc3200

=GAMMO= · 13 Apr 2004 at 16:43

Heres mine, no way near as good as your lot but better than some ive seen, ill repost when i get my next gen card too

2001> 14271 >http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k1=7513667

2003> 1750 >http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k3=2011373 <didnt think that was too bad for my old G4Ti4200 64mb card

Skii · 13 Apr 2004 at 16:47

XP-2200
1Gb DDR 333
Fx5950 Ultra 128

11175 3D Mark 2001 SE :rolleyes:

5350 3D Mark 2003

Rojin · 13 Apr 2004 at 16:54

SN45G Shuttle
XP-M2500@2400Mhz
Sapphire 9800XT (DNA Drivers)

2001 [19328]: http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k1=7729230
2003 [7350]: http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k3=2348695

Hedge · 13 Apr 2004 at 17:04

2003 - http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k3=2346512

Kinetic · 13 Apr 2004 at 17:06

Only use 2003 ATM

Sapphire 9800pro 128

5490 @ Stock
5970 @ clocked speeds (430/350)

Hedge · 13 Apr 2004 at 17:19

Originally posted by Kinetic
Only use 2003 ATM

Sapphire 9800pro 128

5490 @ Stock
5970 @ clocked speeds (430/350)

nevermind