• Competitor rules

    Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.

Prediction - Intel to buy Nvidia?

ok lets put it another way....

9/10 AMD motherboards only support Crossfire not SLI....

If this was intel/nvidia doing this it would be wrong as they are the bigger players... but yet it is fine for the smaller player to do so...

I know that the partners make the boards but lets be honnest AMD wont help or make it equal to support SLI...

Ok you put it another way, but your argument still doesn't hold any water because you haven't got your facts right, you must have known you wasn't sure or even confident of the facts before you hit the submit button right?

Additionally to Kylew's comment, Nvidia doesn't want SLI on AMD chipset's, that's why they refuse to develop AMD chipsets full stop since AMD purchased Ati.
The only reason SLI is on current Intel based chipsets is because Intel refused to give them a chipset licence to build chipsets which forced Nv's hand, so it looks like Nvidia is on the Intel Hit-list since they are planning on getting in on the GPU market soon.

The intention for Nvidia was to weaken the AMD platform as a whole by limiting choice. This is having less of an impact the weaker Nv get's and could well backfire for them.
Also SLI has license fees that Nv charge just for the privilege of using SLI.
 
I think intel is buying into wireless, going in different directions

I actually think Intel is playing a dangerous game here, they could get so large that the government threaten to break the company up. M$ was lucky enough to escape this fate as that was previously on the cards.

If Intel arn't there own worst enemy and don't get too big for their own good, then using surplus cash now to buy into other markets is an extremely good idea and acts as insurance.

For example say Intel hit a wall in terms of process technology and now AMD is on a level playing field (process technologies increasingly taking longer to transition to new nodes), Intel's margins would be drastically squeezed trying to hold on to market share especially now Intel have to be on good behaviour, Intel's margins would be hit even more should Amd pull a rabbit out the hat again and have a CPU that outperforms Intel's.

So with Intel diversifying it's portfolio it would allow them to severely cut the prices of it's CPU's to maintain a cost advantage over AMD and remain more competitive as to not lose much market share. Intel as a whole will still be making money though hand over fist, through the rest of it's revenue stream that they previously invested ten's maybe by then even hundreds of billions in.

This strategy may also enable Intel to use more 'legal' ways of removing competition. It could for example pick a market sector ANY market sector one at a time, and sell their products barley above cost without all this kickback nonsense, this would make it very difficult for the competition in that area to compete forcing most of the competition to hit the wall while Intel then picks up their IP on the cheap.
Intel could then wait until there were two or three remaining competitors to avoid the attention of the FTC before raising prices to reasonable levels again, only now they have much more market share and better margins due to less competition, Intel could then do the same with another market sector.
 
Nvidia and Apple both have the biggest idiots in the business for CEOs, but they are still remaining successful.
 
The Nvidia corporation/brand is strong, they will ride the rough seas and emerge a better company for it.


@ those picking up on spelling errors, and the petty insults, just sad.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom