premium small / mid size SUV options

Associate
Joined
7 Sep 2014
Posts
1,169
Hi,

I'm looking at getting a small / mid sized SUV, I'm wanting something that is 4 wheel drive, has respectable performance (sub 9 second 0-60). Prefer something that has a nice interior. Budget is <£32K outright or < £475 PCP. I've looked at the BMW options and I do like the X1 and X3, but was wondering what other options there might be (never really looked at SUVs before).

Thanks

UL
 
Personally I wouldn't go for 4wd. Disparity between front and rear tyre thread or even same axle would cause false slippage detection and future (expensive) damage. The thought of needing to replace more than the affected tyre in case one can't be repaired, as wasteful, is financially a problem, specially when you consider decent tyres at 120/150 a piece, if not more.
Also 4wd and summer tyres or cheapo ones, wouldn't perform any better than 2wd and all season. And some technologies like grip control from Peugeot work quite well with all season tyres.
Engine, a large SUV would be better suitable with a diesel engine, or a decent petrol. A smaller SUV, I would suggest at least a 2.0 diesel 150hp or a 1.8/2.0 petrol 180-200hp. The 3 cylinders may work well for city cars, but something bigger and a no so aerodynamically friendly as a SUV, on motorways, would require careful, I mean, careful, planning before any overtake.
Particularly I like the X1 and X2. Excellent automatic. Also like the GLC, but not really keen on the GLA, as feels much more like a cross over, as don't offer much improvement as one would expect, as something labeled SUV. Not high enough. Marginally higher than a golf, at least how I felt. Audi I only like the TT and the A5. And unless going for a 2.0 engine, the awful and unreliable 7 speed dry clutch DSG still being used. XC40 is nice, despite my despite for the rear lights. And the Jaguar E-Pace looks more desirable than its bigger brother, the F-Pace, but is heavier, as still uses the old stell frame from ancient land rovers.
If not only considering badges, the new coming CX30 from Mazda or the Sportage from Kia are very well equipped cars.
I also should mention the Lexus small SUV or a cheaper option, the Honda C-HR.
 
VW T-Roc looks pretty nice. We have a Tiguan which I absolutely love - does everything we ask of it.
T-Roc is getting good reviews. Not keen on the rear light, but may be positive for most. The light weight DSG still being used, which is a big no-no, but seems to be less problems when used for the low torque 1.0 engines. Quite a push when Seat used for the 1.8TSI and it's 180hp, and have to cap the torque to 250nm, which was the limit of the DSG 7 Speed, but apparently that didn't stopped the problems to happen.
 
Had a 2013 Honda CR-V (2.0 petrol) for 5 years as the family wagon. It was really reliable, couldn't fault it at all, but really really dull to drive. Test drove an X3 M40i and it felt like SUVs could actually be fun so went for one of those - although that probably slightly out of that budget you mention at the moment. No complaints with the new X3 on the whole though, it's a nice place to be inside for an SUV.
 
Thanks for the suggestions, on 4x4, my new place is a bit in the sticks and wanting something that could cope with snow.

I have asked for a test drive in the Mazda CX5 and CX-30.

As pointed to above the Yeti is no longer in production and a friend has one and I'm not sure the interior quite meets what a I would like being totally honest.

I'll defo take a look at the T-roc (also heard that Skoda have their own version out soon?)
 
Owned a CX-5 for over a years, but already replaced. Great car. Problem is I'm always tempted to change cars. From coupé to SUV, to super mini, to hatch, to another hatch, to SUV, to hatch now.
The CX5 is very well built and has all the accessories you need. Is very spacious and the seats are very comfortable. The engine, as it was the 2wd 150hp diesel could have a bit more to it, but if you're aiming for the 4wd, the extra 25hp will be spot-on. The cabin is very quiet. More importantly, isn't a van-like car to drive.
 
I have no direct experience, but mention of the CX5 reminded me an old friend mentioned he'd bought one and been pleasantly surprised by it.

His other cars are a proper Mini with lots of goodies and a Focus ST to give you some context for his views on the CX5.
 
Thanks for the suggestions, on 4x4, my new place is a bit in the sticks and wanting something that could cope with snow.

I have asked for a test drive in the Mazda CX5 and CX-30.

As pointed to above the Yeti is no longer in production and a friend has one and I'm not sure the interior quite meets what a I would like being totally honest.

I'll defo take a look at the T-roc (also heard that Skoda have their own version out soon?)

I'd definitely say go for selectable 2/4WD over something that is always 4x4 - one of the reasons I've ended up with a Nissan Navara right now is due to moving out a bit in the sticks and wanting something that could perform at least a little better than a regular car though as mentioned above in those circumstances the tyres make the biggest difference and down here realistically we have maybe 1-2 days a year with weather like that :s but as I work a lot of nights and remote sites I'd rather be prepared than otherwise.
 
Some great lease deals on Land Rover products lately. Evoque HSE < £250pm and Velar at < 400. Worth keeping an eye out. I just picked up a Velar HSE for 350pm.

As above, Audi Allroad are great cars. 90% of the capability of a "proper 4x4" and definately much better than any of the cross overs. Had an A6 Allroad for last couple of years.
 
I'd also check out the Volvo XC60. Cracking car, drives well, best interior around imo and looks good. I looked at the Tiguan, and it felt a bit cheap inside. CX5 and CRV are good shouts too.
 
Some great lease deals on Land Rover products lately. Evoque HSE < £250pm and Velar at < 400. Worth keeping an eye out. I just picked up a Velar HSE for 350pm.

As above, Audi Allroad are great cars. 90% of the capability of a "proper 4x4" and definately much better than any of the cross overs. Had an A6 Allroad for last couple of years.

Does £350 include the amortised upfront rental payment?
 
Personally I wouldn't go for 4wd. Disparity between front and rear tyre thread or even same axle would cause false slippage detection and future (expensive) damage.

eh? what on earth are you on about. There was an invention of the differential some years back! Ive had mainly 4wd vehicles for the last 20 years and never ever had any of those issues. Pretty sure car manufacturers perfected this 20 years ago!

The thought of needing to replace more than the affected tyre in case one can't be repaired, as wasteful, is financially a problem, specially when you consider decent tyres at 120/150 a piece, if not more.

Whilst this is recommended it isnt particularly required.

Also 4wd and summer tyres or cheapo ones, wouldn't perform any better than 2wd and all season. And some technologies like grip control from Peugeot work quite well with all season tyres.

Have you driven a 4wd car? its night and day, and the only way a 2wd car is going to get better traction is if its wearing winter tyres. The other 99% of the time, the 4wd is more sure footed and gets better drive.

...the F-Pace, but is heavier, as still uses the old stell frame from ancient land rovers..

lol. Having owned old land rovers I can tell you the f-pace shares zero in common with an old defender or discovery even upto 2015! The f-pace has a monocoque, and the old land rovers have a steel ladder chassis with a seperate body on top. Its literally nothing like an f-pace.
 
Back
Top Bottom