Prey

gadget^ · 8 Nov 2006 at 19:50

game rocks - love it so much made me jump in a few places takes me back to the days playing AvP now thats a clasic

ins0mn1ac · 8 Nov 2006 at 19:55

yup it is, completed it twice now, one of my faves.

HighlandeR · 9 Nov 2006 at 00:11

Definatly agree it was VERY well polished and the shader effects were amazing they made proper use of it, more importantly they didnt make the game too complicated, it was just perfect the way they handeled the puzzles....

They didnt overdo that mavity effect where u can walk on walls and on ceilings either

Storyline was good/shocking at end..

I dont think we will see a prequel if anything it would take another 10 years to make!

Gommsta · 9 Nov 2006 at 00:19

Enjoyable game, made me feel a bit ill at some points!

Mr-White · 9 Nov 2006 at 09:26

seems like im the only one who got bored

MW

DEL 707 · 9 Nov 2006 at 10:05

I enjoyed it, the story was good at the beginning and the end, was kinda missing and drawn out in the middle.

Prey was a good game, but I've never felt the need to replay it unfortunatly. Saying that, the only FPS games that I've replayed in recent years are HL2 and Dark Messiah.

hardc0re_tid · 9 Nov 2006 at 10:07

how does it compare to HL2 FEAR etc, other FPS's

Van_Dammesque · 9 Nov 2006 at 11:49

hardc0re_tid said:
how does it compare to HL2 FEAR etc, other FPS's

Up there with them IMHO, great game!

ins0mn1ac · 9 Nov 2006 at 11:51

if you complete it though you have to watch through the credits for the good bit!

Mud · 9 Nov 2006 at 11:55

I'm playing this at the moment too, not great screenshots, but a representation of the prettiness.

Pablo72 · 9 Nov 2006 at 12:00

How do you think this game would hold up to the below system specs...

AMD 64 4000+, 2 Gig of Ram, XFX 7800GTX 256mb, 74bg Raptor

Cheers

Daniel · 9 Nov 2006 at 12:07

Pablo72 said:
How do you think this game would hold up to the below system specs...

AMD 64 4000+, 2 Gig of Ram, XFX 7800GTX 256mb, 74bg Raptor

Cheers

If it's any help, I played the demo on a dual AMD 2400+ MP PC with SCSI drives, 2.5GB ram and a ATI 9800 Pro. Had to have the game at lower settings but it ran ok.

I never did get the full game as the room shifting made me feek sick.

Dan

Quixote · 9 Nov 2006 at 12:08

"How do you think this game would hold up to the below system specs...

AMD 64 4000+, 2 Gig of Ram, XFX 7800GTX 256mb, 74bg Raptor"

Just fine, I would say. That's a pretty powerful setup.

Pablo72 · 9 Nov 2006 at 12:24

Quixote said:
AMD 64 4000+, 2 Gig of Ram, XFX 7800GTX 256mb, 74bg Raptor"

Just fine, I would say. That's a pretty powerful setup.

Thanks for replying. My system was pretty powerful, when I got it over a year ago... but with the advent of dula-core and SLI and dual GPU cards, my system is already looking a little dated.

I'm currently trying to track down a XFX 7800GTX 256mb card so I can go SLI, and try to keep up with the latest software.

Such is the PC business, I guess!!!!

gadget^ · 9 Nov 2006 at 13:12

Daniel said:
I never did get the full game as the room shifting made me feek sick

me too but well worth stick with it - tbh felt it was awesome attempt at something different

<Dubz> · 9 Nov 2006 at 13:23

Try multiplayer! Sick bucket at the ready!

Great game though.

ins0mn1ac · 9 Nov 2006 at 13:28

<De@thW!sh> said:
Try multiplayer! Sick bucket at the ready!

Great game though.

I tried it for abit, its veryyyy fast paced. Best thing to do I thought was hide your body by a portal an go spirit mode an shoot ppl, its ace

gadget^ · 9 Nov 2006 at 13:37

deleted said:
I tried it for abit, its veryyyy fast paced. Best thing to do I thought was hide your body by a portal an go spirit mode an shoot ppl, its ace

what servers guys fancy giving it ago myself this evening

Borden · 9 Nov 2006 at 16:25

How does this compare to Quake 4? I really enjoyed blasting stroggs to bits.

Supercow · 9 Nov 2006 at 16:29

Added to the comments, I found that it runs so well on a system 3 years old or so, at max setting. Quite nicely done from a dev perspective I thought