Hi guys,
I decided this afternoon to cobble together my first Intel based PC in about 8 years, my first foray away from the AMD camp if you will. Doesn't look to daunting and from reading a few spec me threads I've initially selected the following items:
So I guess the question is which is going to be more fun or interesting a project the dual or quad core system in terms of day to day performance and overclocking...
I'm well aware nothing mainstream uses 4 cores but can comparable performance be obtained from this against dual core processors with similar clocks, does the lower FSB 1066 vs 1333 have any real world bearing?
I know the sensible option is to purchase the C2D as I have no call for enhanced encoding performance or any other multi-threaded applications for that matter.
So to wrap things up two cores good four cores bad, or does anyone have any experiences I can borrow from while making this decision.
Regards
I decided this afternoon to cobble together my first Intel based PC in about 8 years, my first foray away from the AMD camp if you will. Doesn't look to daunting and from reading a few spec me threads I've initially selected the following items:
- ASUS P5K
- Intel C2D 6750
- GeIL 2GB PC2-6400C4
So I guess the question is which is going to be more fun or interesting a project the dual or quad core system in terms of day to day performance and overclocking...
I'm well aware nothing mainstream uses 4 cores but can comparable performance be obtained from this against dual core processors with similar clocks, does the lower FSB 1066 vs 1333 have any real world bearing?
I know the sensible option is to purchase the C2D as I have no call for enhanced encoding performance or any other multi-threaded applications for that matter.
So to wrap things up two cores good four cores bad, or does anyone have any experiences I can borrow from while making this decision.
Regards