Professional Athletes

Soldato
Joined
5 Mar 2009
Posts
3,050
Location
North
I'm almost certain that when I was young (thirty odd years ago), that olympic athletes weren't allowed to be professional athletes. Has this changed? The tennis players spring to mind.
 
I just seem to remember the Americans having their top athletes in well paid positions in the army. So they were well paid soldiers who trained for the olympics, sort of a get out clause. Could be that I have it wrong though.
 
The 1988 thing might explain the dominance of communist countries until the rules were relaxed. Moscow 1980, USSR won 80 gold and East Germany 47, 3rd place it dropped to eight.
 
Moscow 1980 was a bit of an aberration in that the US (amongst a few other countries) refused to attend so that naturally allowed the USSR the chance of winning many more medals than they otherwise would have.

Set in context though you've also got to consider a number of the results there dubious given there were noted and widescale doping programmes for a number of the communist countries. That's not to say that there couldn't have been clean athletes from those countries but unfortunately there has to be a certain amount of suspicion falling on the medalists in particular from that sort of time period.

I'd also point out that I don't think the other countries were necessarily clean, I'd suspect many weren't but perhaps weren't as focused on it as an ideological exemplar of the proof that their nation and method of governance was better. I think the Olympics and sport in general have made great strides in eliminating drugs cheats which might go some way to explaining some variance in the results.

It's certainly changed for the better, there's still two countries dominating but it's not a massive leap in medals, just seems a lot more level nowadays.
 
Back
Top Bottom