• Competitor rules

    Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.

Programmer workstation graphics card.

Associate
Joined
12 Jan 2011
Posts
10
I am speccing a high-end programmers workstation and do not know what level of graphic card I need. This new PC will never run games software, edit video or play DVDs but it will need to support oodles of multi-monitor desktop space running under Windows 7. The M/B will be supporting an overclocked Sandybridge so that rules out on-chip Intel graphics.

The central screen will be 30" @ 2560 x 1600 with my existing 1600 x 1200 monitor (DVI input} to the side. A 3rd screen of around 20" is a possibility in the future.

Software development tools create diagrams these days but otherwise it's all text and rectangles.

I don't want the VGA card(s) to be a performance bottleneck however neither do I wish to throw money at some hot high-end card that adds to case noise.

What graphic card should I buy?
 
By the sounds of it an IDE such as Visual Studio/Eclipse and diagramming/UML software.
Yes Visual Studio, the recent versions allow internal windows to be dragged outside the main window of the app and onto other screens.

Once a program gets to 20,000 lines plus diagrams are needed to paint a picture of program structure. Then in other windows I will have a database query trace running, finally I might be running Firebug to trap execution of browser page JavaScript. All in all one expansive desktop but a low rate of UI update relative to a game I suspect.
 
You can use a Z68 board to allow you to use the onboard SB GPU, so one monitor will connect to that, while the other two will connect to a bog standard cheap GPU.
Yes a new Z68 is a logical choice but I have been following the first reviews on Anandtech and the initial perf numbers are far from stellar. The SSD caching of the Z68 is no benefit to me because a 128 Gb SSD is all the storage I need in my machine.
 
Are you going to be doing any 3d modelling, rendering etc?
Nope, nothing like that.

An overclocked CPU is a bad idea if the system is intended for any serious work - especially if you're speccing on behalf of a client.
The new PC is for personal use.

My last overclocked PC had a turbo button that hoiked the CPU from 20 to 25MgHz and I was hoping that 20 years later the auto overclocking discovery utility program available for an advanced Pro Asus motherboard made the whole o/c process more reliable.

I believe I would feel the difference between 3.6 and 4.6 GHz when working.
 
Back
Top Bottom