• Competitor rules

    Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.

Proving a C2D > a A64 X2

He belongs to the category " Moron ". I mean seriously, how stubborn can one get when solid facts are there in front. Thick skinned.
 
All Titania's base are belong to us.

:D


Really would like him / her to post back though. Only to get swamped by the would be A-Team ;)
 
TomL said:
The person posting in this thread is infuriating me. Please someone have a look Titanania's posts and see what he's on about. Am I allowed to link to other forums, strange feeling I'm not.
Click to expand...
Only read the first 2 pages so far. Quite funny so far..... :)

*just registered on their forums :) lol

-replied ;)
 
Last edited:
i dont know enough about new CPU's to post a good argument on that thread, but i know that C2D is better from reading anything on the net lol.

nicely done guys :p
 
I prefer AMD, im no kind of fanboy.

No fanboy/girl could be that blind surely ?


Intel at the moment are far better in every way.

End of.
 
SidewinderINC said:
but i know that C2D is better from reading anything on the net lol.
Click to expand...

Actually were all wrong....
There is something better than the Core2Duos.....

Core2Quadro ;)

thats apparantly really slow due to the small fsb, and because theres 4 core they get confused and slow each other down.....
 
PinkFloyd said:
Actually were all wrong....
There is something better than the Core2Duos.....

Core2Quadro ;)

thats apparantly really slow due to the small fsb, and because theres 4 core they get confused and slow each other down.....
Click to expand...


nah, whether C2Q is better or not is irrelevant :p

C2D is still better than AMD's counterpart.
 
titanania said:
do have facts, check Speedfan for temps. Intels REQUIRE liquid cooling and even then are unstable from the heat. AMDs not Intels can be overclocked with air. And quit getting YOUR sources from people who melt AMDs by disabling motherboard safeguards (ie Toms hardware)
Click to expand...
LOL, a intel unstable on stock speed and needs liquid cooling to work :D :D



What are mobo's safeguards :confused: ?


same guy as above said:
AMD = better performance with less energy used and less heat produced + DOUBLE FSB speed + little ventilation required (built to overclock) = Better performance and stability (even when gaming)

Intel = "faster" (energy hog) (huge amount of heat produced) + HALF of AMD's FSB +more expensive chip that tends to overheat and requires massive ventilation (not built to overclock) = "Faster" gaming at the cost of high energy usage (if you consider 200 points on 3DMark06 for 300 dollars more) , high heat and less stability (In my opinion not worth it at all)
Click to expand...

Why is he still repeating amd's use less power, they use a lot more as core 2 duo's :confused: ...


Hmmmmm oh yea not 64 bit.......
Click to expand...

lollollol rofl lmao
 
Last edited:
PinkFloyd said:
Aw the thread has been locked.... what did Raikiri say?
Click to expand...


Nothing... just some 'blasphemy' which I got shouted at for then when they said something like: Maybe I should just ban your arse I edited it and questioned their use of the word arse if I wasn't allowed to say god :/

And some stuff about my 6300 owning an fx-62 :)
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom