• Competitor rules

    Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.

Q6600 v Q9450

Associate
Joined
14 Apr 2008
Posts
998
Right , I'm stuck. I have a budget and if I buy the Q9450 I will run over the budget once I buy Speakers etc, but I think If i got with the Q6600 then I could do it.

I will use the pc for Gaming/Graphic Design(Photoshop,Illustrator)/Internet/Music all at the same time(Bar the Graphic Design)

Looking at the specs , It seems you pay the extra for 4mb extra cache and also the .2 ghz extra. Is it really worth it for a user like me?

Could use explain the Cache and also the stepping i have read about somewhere?

I can get the Q9450 for £210 And the Q6600 for £140. Which could make me buy a new amplifier etc
 
Last edited:
do you need an amp for the speakers because they're huge or something?

Half decent mobos normally have more than acceptable onboard sound, high spec mobos now often come with their own daughterboard soundcards and alternatively there's the Asus soundcards.

I'd avoid the xfis tbh, bad experiences and the driver support is awful.

Also you need to change your sig mate, its 400x75 pixels/20kb max, thought I'd tell you before a mod does :)

Done.

I understood I need an Amp to connect them to the Hi Fi Speakers I have.
 
Back
Top Bottom