Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.
Jokester said:It's not a native quad core as I believe that only applies if the CPU was a single lump of silicon. The Kentsfield is actually two distinct Conroe cores mounted on the same PCB.
Jokester
tastyweat said:Yeah... and they're linked together by the FSB
Perfect_Chaos said:actually ive read on a lot of articles that true quad core chips would be much better performing than 2 dual cores stuck together.
experience said:In gaming etc the x6800 xtreme destroys the quad core.
experience said:
experience said:the quad core is infact not a quad core. It is a psuedo quad core which other than benchmarks ie sisoft sandra, actually under performs compared to an x6800 extreme dual core. In gaming etc the x6800 xtreme destroys the quad core. The quad core will be useful when desktop apps that can utilise them actually appear. However the first genuine quad core will be AMD early next year. The chip of choice for the moment is without doubt x6800 xtreme dual core - the fastest you can buy as a consumer.
Yes, get core2duo chips.
experience said:
experience said:the quad core is infact not a quad core. It is a psuedo quad core which other than benchmarks ie sisoft sandra, actually under performs compared to an x6800 extreme dual core. In gaming etc the x6800 xtreme destroys the quad core. The quad core will be useful when desktop apps that can utilise them actually appear. However the first genuine quad core will be AMD early next year. The chip of choice for the moment is without doubt x6800 xtreme dual core - the fastest you can buy as a consumer.
Yes, get core2duo chips.