i'm looking to build a multi-core system largely for the purpose of virtualisation using the 'free' vmware server, but before i outlay any hard earned i just want to check how it will actually perform. will the 'free' version of vmware actually utilise more than one core, or is the benefit such that vmware will use one of the cores leaving the other available for multi-tasking using different applications?
-
Competitor rules
Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.
question about 'free' virtualisation and multicore cpu's.
- Thread starter atomiser
- Start date
i suppose what im getting at is, for example, could i run vmware on windows xp and then perhaps have a 2003 server vm running on one core whilst running a linux distribution on another core? edit: as opposed to making the vm 'dual-core' as i think you might have thought i meant. (if that even makes sense!)
at the moment the budget part of me is saying run an amd dual-core 6000+ whereas the extravagant part of me is saying plump for a core 2 quad! no point in getting the quad though if 2 or 3 of the cores will be sat there idle though!
at the moment the budget part of me is saying run an amd dual-core 6000+ whereas the extravagant part of me is saying plump for a core 2 quad! no point in getting the quad though if 2 or 3 of the cores will be sat there idle though!
Last edited: