• Competitor rules

    Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.

R9 Nano Review thread

Everything past a 970/390 is overpriced but Nvidia's the guilty one, They started it. Proved it could be gotten away with and AMD followed suit,

But hey, At least Nvidia did something first :D

One could argue that AMD started it with the mental pricing of the 7970 but one won't :p
 
Though some console style cases have PCI-E risers so you fit the card at an angle. Cases like the Silverstone Raven RVZ01, while not exactly tiny, will fit a full sized graphics card.

the SG13 is pretty tiny and will take a 980ti (or any other blower style card)
the ones that can't seem to be taller but shorter, so about the same size (or bigger) overall
 
Me? Never :p

I skim read it at first and then looked at the obvious thing (e.g: 100, 120 and 140 missing) and was like... whaaa.

I didn't read what Greg said either.
 
Why display just the 1080p graphs from Anand? The 4k results are much more relevant, or even the 1440. It performs it's best at 4k and it's higher in the rankins and they are even the first graphs Anand displays, it's like you have gone out of your way to show it perform at it's worse in an environment it isn't aimed at. Seriously?
 
Why display just the 1080p graphs from Anand? The 4k results are much more relevant, or even the 1440. It performs it's best at 4k and it's higher in the rankins and they are even the first graphs Anand displays, it's like you have gone out of your way to show it perform at it's worse in an environment it isn't aimed at. Seriously?

Pretty sure thats intended to showcase how stupid cherry picked benchmarks are, judging by gregs message anyway ;)
 
Back
Top Bottom