RAGE what a dissopointment.

Evilsod · 11 Oct 2011 at 17:20

FrenchTart said:
Indeed. Chrome has this feature without any addons (and tbh I thought Firefox without addons also had it these days).

I dunno why it doesn't give you the option of installing 1 when you install firefox tbh rather than expecting you to go find it. I completely forgot about it after my reformat. Thought my spelling had just improved

Dicehunter · 11 Oct 2011 at 17:22

Well ill get the addon for firefox then ^^

orderoftheflame · 11 Oct 2011 at 17:51

Evilsod said:
I dunno why it doesn't give you the option of installing 1 when you install firefox tbh rather than expecting you to go find it. I completely forgot about it after my reformat. Thought my spelling had just improved

It does have it. But it's the US dictionary despite you downloading the en-GB version for some retarded reason.

barmyllama · 11 Oct 2011 at 18:02

orderoftheflame said:
This. If everyone with an opinion felt the need to make their own thread every time you wouldn't be able to find anything.

Exactly.

It's bad enough as it is with multiple threads on the same subject.

Someone started yet another Battlefield 3 thread the other day, so I searched the forum for "battlefield 3" and posted a link to every one. Then I searched "BF3" and that produced even more threads on the subject. All in all I reckon there were the best part of a hundred threads relating to Battlefield 3.

I can understand that some of them had a good reason to be a seperate thread, but most of them could have gone in the very large Battlefield 3 thread that already existed.

albert · 11 Oct 2011 at 18:28

Omg ... get a life people. Who cares if this is a new thread.

FrenchTart · 11 Oct 2011 at 18:29

albert said:
Omg ... get a life people. Who cares if this is a new thread.

Omg...get a life man. Who cares if people care that it's a new thread?

monkeyboy7 · 11 Oct 2011 at 20:24

That's what you get when they port a game over to PC for extra cash--no graphic settings. I don't get why they didn't develop it for PC first. At least Bethesda admitted to this misstep.

barmyllama · 11 Oct 2011 at 21:01

monkeyboy7 said:
That's what you get when they port a game over to PC for extra cash--no graphic settings. I don't get why they didn't develop it for PC first. At least Bethesda admitted to this misstep.

It's not a port, the engine is designed to scale dynamically to run at a constant 60 FPS depending on the hardware processing power available. You don't need graphics settings since it will run at the highest detail it can on your PC while maintaining a frame rate of 60 FPS. The engine was developed to run on all harware including tablet PC's and mobile phones.

Any problems with the game are down to Nvidia and AMD not supplying developers with the same drivers that they release to the public or vice versa. AMD even released a Rage specific driver that made things worse.

ThundyCat · 11 Oct 2011 at 21:36

orderoftheflame said:
Was the massive thread with pages of comments and fixes not good enough?

Lots of your questions/comments have been addressed.

Evilsod said:
Why did you need to create a new thread for this instead of posting in the Rage thread? Oh thats right, because the Rage thread has answered this sort of post 10 times in the last week.

barmyllama said:
I'm disappointed that you think your opinion is more valid than everyone elses by starting a new thread, when others have discussed their opinions in the large thread that already exists.

Indeed.

Thread closed.