Rainbow VI BETA Benchmark

humbug · 27 Sep 2015 at 19:13

I'm not planning on making a proper benchmark thread for this as its a closed BETA, i just thought it would be fun to compare results.

Use these custom settings. (Everything maxed)

List CPU, GPU and their clocks.
And the results screenshot.

Scoreboard is here http://forums.overclockers.co.uk/showpost.php?p=28614672&postcount=2

humbug · 27 Sep 2015 at 19:13

1080P

#1 - Score: 206.4 - GTX 980TI @ ?????????? - whyscotty
#2 - Score: 141.8 - GTX 970 @ 1554/2000 - humbug
#3 - Score: 116.0 - GTX 780 @ 1110/6040 - Ian Evey

1440P

#1 - Score: 123.9 - GTX 980TI @ 1354/1753 - whyscotty
#2 - Score: 91.2 - 290 @ 1030/1250 - shankly1985

2160P

#1 - Score: 63.7 - GTX 980TI @ 1354/1753 - whyscotty

humbug · 27 Sep 2015 at 19:14

FX-9590 @ 4.8Ghz
Gigabyte WF3X GTX 970 OC @ 1500/1900

whyscotty · 27 Sep 2015 at 19:28

[email protected] - - 980ti 1354/1753

1080

1440

2160

shankly1985 · 27 Sep 2015 at 22:16

1440P i7 3770k @4.4 - 290 @1030/1250 Windows 10 Driver 15.8 Beta

Max 135fps because that's my frame rate cap.

humbug · 28 Sep 2015 at 00:07

Black X Shanks ^^^ no picture.

can't you remove the Frame rate cap?

GoogalyMoogaly · 28 Sep 2015 at 00:15

Is this a DX12/Vulkan benchmark or just DX11?

shankly1985 · 28 Sep 2015 at 00:22

humbug said:
Black X Shanks ^^^ no picture. can't you remove the Frame rate cap?

Working now? Yeah I can but thats just for my freesync ranges am not avg over max frame rate so i'll ignore max. One thing I do know is the benchmark is much more demanding than gameplay. I stay around 100fps and never drop below 80fps

GoogalyMoogaly said:
Is this a DX12/Vulkan benchmark or just DX11?

DX11 only I believe

humbug · 28 Sep 2015 at 01:40

shankly1985 said:
Working now? Yeah I can but thats just for my freesync ranges am not avg over max frame rate so i'll ignore max. One thing I do know is the benchmark is much more demanding than gameplay. I stay around 100fps and never drop below 80fps

DX11 only I believe

Yeah now i see it

will make a results table later.

humbug · 28 Sep 2015 at 02:54

Done

humbug · 28 Sep 2015 at 13:42

FX-9590 @ 4.8Ghz
Gigabyte WF3X GTX 970 OC @ 1554/2000

141.8

Pleb GTX 970 is 29 Percentage points behind a GTX 980TI

razorpakk · 28 Sep 2015 at 13:55

It is well optimized or just bad graphics?
It's also tight spaces I guess, so that helps.

humbug · 28 Sep 2015 at 14:00

razorpakk said:
It is well optimized or just bad graphics?
It's also tight spaces I guess, so that helps.

Graphics are nothing special but they are not bad at all.

The game is pretty well optimised, unusually for Ubisoft.

razorpakk · 28 Sep 2015 at 14:17

I think things will only get better (pc ports), simply because Steam and the others have had a good impact on sales.
It's just a better business decision to do a decent job.

humbug · 28 Sep 2015 at 14:25

razorpakk said:
I think things will only get better (pc ports), simply because Steam and the others have had a good impact on sales.
It's just a better business decision to do a decent job.

I think it helps performance if you don't have hardware vendors sticking their crap in it wanting to use it as a billboard.

shankly1985 · 28 Sep 2015 at 15:01

razorpakk said:
It is well optimized or just bad graphics?
It's also tight spaces I guess, so that helps.

The lighting and effects are very impressive.

whyscotty · 28 Sep 2015 at 16:54

humbug said:
FX-9590 @ 4.8Ghz
Gigabyte WF3X GTX 970 OC @ 1554/2000

141.8

Pleb GTX 970 is 29 Percentage points behind a GTX 980TI

humbug · 28 Sep 2015 at 17:38

whyscotty said:

Updated.

whyscotty · 28 Sep 2015 at 18:37

You must practice a lot as you're very good

humbug · 28 Sep 2015 at 18:40

whyscotty said:
You must practice a lot as you're very good

lol, that's you

The cat is me.