rainbox 6 vegas

CHUDS

CHUDS

CHUDS

Permabanned
Joined
15 Oct 2006
Posts
567
Location
N.Ireland
i want to get the new rainbow six, looks class but i want to know if there are many buggys or glitches with it? after hearing about the new splinter cell i am a bit nervous.
anyone have it? some screen shots would be excellent
 
searchki1.gif


all the best !!
 
eekfek said:
searchki1.gif


all the best !!
Click to expand...


LOL :D :D :D

A good game/AI though coded for 1 cpu & can run very slow unless you have an uber PC & before people start sayin 'it runs smooth on mine', everyones perception of smooth is different & 20-30fps is poo
 
CHUDS said:
i want to get the new rainbow six, looks class but i want to know if there are many buggys or glitches with it? after hearing about the new splinter cell i am a bit nervous.
anyone have it? some screen shots would be excellent
Click to expand...

ive got it and well i have to say it is buggy......

With 2gb ram, an athlon at 2.8 and a X1900XT i cant barely run the game :(

Best wait for a patch that fixes this. ;)
 
juno_first said:
amd dualcore @ 2.64, 2gig ram, 2x 7800gtx
after turning shadows off the game is just about playable
Click to expand...

:eek: Is it too late to strike this one off my xmas wish list?!
 
Rig in my sig plays this just fine at 1024x768, all options on, i have no idea of the frame rate but it has not stuttered or seamed to slow down at all so i say get it, a fantastic game.

As for the guy with the SLI, perhaps your setup is not correct or your trying to play at an unnessacary resolution ?
 
with 1x 7800 it gives like 10fps at 1280 with all options on except shadows, even with a vegas profile. I find 1280 necessary with a 19" lcd.
so i use 2x7800gtx & get a just playable 22fps minimum 45fps average & thats with a score of 7650 in 3dmk06.
 
Rig below - max settings apart from shadows which are on medium - anything less looks utter cack - and get 25-35fps most of the time. There are some random occasions where it drops to >10 if I look in a certain direction, even if there's absolutely nothing special going on there. Running at 1280x800, slightly lower than native res of 1440x900.

Bloody good game imo, apart from the fact it's a shoddy console port.
 
runs great on my 8800GTX with everything on at 1600x1200. Downloaded the hacked file which lets you run 1920x1200 again runs great but the hack doesn't let me turn everything on.

Great game although restarting when you die is a bit of a pain.
 
mm think this is another case of cack port from 360,run,s kinda ok on my gts but not happy at all smooth one minute rubbish the nest.
took shodows down was a lot better but thats not the point should run great on the pc i shall not be buying any more ubisoft stuff any more total disgrace.

and why has the pc mags not picked up on this ?
sounds like some back handers going on here to me same with splinter cell da bugged to hell from what i here infact is does not even rum on my box with gts card get .exe error and thats after patch's :(

disgusting programing as far as im concerned.

Agent smith yes think it does
 
Last edited:
Runs alright on my system (A64 3500+/2gb/X1900XT 512mb) except for these massive and sudden frame rate drops. The frame drops seem to occur in certain areas or when looking in a particular direction. The odd thing is that these slowdowns do not always occur due to graphical complexity, so for example you could be in a closed room, looking at the wall and the frame rate will drop to 10fps. Other times you'll be in lag hell, but take a few steps forward and every thing is silky smooth.

Apart from that the game is excellent fun, but a bit easy, especially when you master the 3rd person peaking feature; taking head shots without even looking through the scope isn't my idea of realism.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom