25 Apr 2013 at 21:49 #1 RichH RichH Associate Joined 1 Dec 2011 Posts 434 Hey Guys, I have never tampered with RAM overclocking until tonight. Am I better off with: 1600 9 9 9 24 (stock) or 1866 10 10 9 24 ?? Thanks in advance.
Hey Guys, I have never tampered with RAM overclocking until tonight. Am I better off with: 1600 9 9 9 24 (stock) or 1866 10 10 9 24 ?? Thanks in advance.
25 Apr 2013 at 21:51 #2 RichH RichH Associate OP Joined 1 Dec 2011 Posts 434 Hmmm, Overcloked settings fail prime95. Perhaps I'll just stick with stock. I understand giving memory a voltage bump is a bad idea?
Hmmm, Overcloked settings fail prime95. Perhaps I'll just stick with stock. I understand giving memory a voltage bump is a bad idea?
25 Apr 2013 at 22:08 #4 RichH RichH Associate OP Joined 1 Dec 2011 Posts 434 Ok thanks. It did start to seem a bit fruitless after 10 mins or so! Do you see any worthwhile gains from OCing ram? Is it something to consider when buying Ram in the future?
Ok thanks. It did start to seem a bit fruitless after 10 mins or so! Do you see any worthwhile gains from OCing ram? Is it something to consider when buying Ram in the future?
25 Apr 2013 at 22:36 #6 RichH RichH Associate OP Joined 1 Dec 2011 Posts 434 Perhaps I'll get better ram next time then. I'll probably be doing another build in a couple of months when Haswell comes out. What is the best on the market at the mo for overclocking?
Perhaps I'll get better ram next time then. I'll probably be doing another build in a couple of months when Haswell comes out. What is the best on the market at the mo for overclocking?
