Following this thread, I've been riding a lot more recently.
Yesterday I went on a route I hadn't been on for a while and smashed 19 PRs, along with six 2nd places (worst brag thread ever, right?).
Anyway, a couple of those "2nd places" were equal in time to previous PRs and it got me thinking. Does anyone know why Strava doesn't rank them as a "joint PR"?
I see some logic, in that the original PR was the first time I achieved that result, but the times were the same, it doesn't make sense to me that equaling a PR should be considered second place. Surely, it should be joint first?
I tried to find some precedent in athletics, e.g. where someone matched an Olympic or World Record in a subsequent competition, but I could only find examples of gold-medal ties at the same meeting.
It would be so easy to implement as well, instead of PR / 2 / 3 in the medal icons, you could just have a horizontal bar or an equals sign.
I'm clearly overthinking it, but does anyone agree with my proposal or is there a legitimate reason for the current system?
Yesterday I went on a route I hadn't been on for a while and smashed 19 PRs, along with six 2nd places (worst brag thread ever, right?).
Anyway, a couple of those "2nd places" were equal in time to previous PRs and it got me thinking. Does anyone know why Strava doesn't rank them as a "joint PR"?
I see some logic, in that the original PR was the first time I achieved that result, but the times were the same, it doesn't make sense to me that equaling a PR should be considered second place. Surely, it should be joint first?
I tried to find some precedent in athletics, e.g. where someone matched an Olympic or World Record in a subsequent competition, but I could only find examples of gold-medal ties at the same meeting.
It would be so easy to implement as well, instead of PR / 2 / 3 in the medal icons, you could just have a horizontal bar or an equals sign.
I'm clearly overthinking it, but does anyone agree with my proposal or is there a legitimate reason for the current system?