Soldato
It was a typo. Not the clock speed, but the unit. It wasn't supposed to be dollars, it was supposed to be pounds, as in a unit of weight.250w 6.5ghz and cooledn on a $20 cooler, yes this "leak" sounds very believable
Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.
It was a typo. Not the clock speed, but the unit. It wasn't supposed to be dollars, it was supposed to be pounds, as in a unit of weight.250w 6.5ghz and cooledn on a $20 cooler, yes this "leak" sounds very believable
250w 6.5ghz and cooledn on a $20 cooler, yes this "leak" sounds very believable
So, buy an Intel CPU if you want more cores (and therefore multithreaded performance). It's not really a focus for AMD. I would guess that the max core count will improve on Ryzen CPUs, as the process technology (almost certainly TSMC) improves and matures, and demand for >8 cores gradually increases.
Well currently, Intel has the ST performance crown. Still unclear if 13900k or 7950X will claim the best stock ST score, rumours suggest Intel will come on top, though you never know!
So what your saying is buy Intel if you want more performance now or buy AMD if you want to spend more cash for less performance as its not AMDs focus right now but have the ability to spend even more cash on a CPU upgrade in a few years as the current one didn't have enough performance to last.So, buy an Intel CPU if you want more cores (and therefore multithreaded performance). It's not really a focus for AMD. I would guess that the max core count will improve on Ryzen CPUs, as the process technology (almost certainly TSMC) improves and matures, and demand for >8 cores gradually increases.
there was no LN2 near it, i saw all the posts this morning on OCN before all the posts were removed, he was gonna start watercooling soon and may of posted up some results, doubtful now as he will be in the naughty corner!!Intel Core i9-13900K single-core reportedly boosts up to 6.5 GHz with very light load (LN2)
Source: https://videocardz.com/newz/asus-ro...quipped-with-core-i9-13900k-cpu-and-20-cooler
Crazy if true - 13th gen seems to run cool and quiet, while Zen4 rumours are of 94DC+ on 360mm AIO. WTB Official reviews so we can see which is true!
there was no LN2 near it, i saw all the posts this morning on OCN before all the posts were removed, he was gonna start watercooling soon and may of posted up some results, doubtful now as he will be in the naughty corner!!
Not true, I upgraded my 6400 to a 6700k a year or two back for £75 and performance was much improved and all I had to do was reinstall the chip and the heatsink. Maybe a minority but not no-one.No one will be interested in buying a 13900K when Meteor Lake and the generation after that are released.
Or, just keep posting here if you enjoy shilling for Intel.So what your saying is buy Intel if you want more performance now or buy AMD if you want to spend more cash for less performance as its not AMDs focus right now but have the ability to spend even more cash on a CPU upgrade in a few years as the current one didn't have enough performance to last.
OK, this statement is just outright horse manure even by your standards.So what your saying is buy Intel if you want more performance now or buy AMD if you want to spend more cash for less performance as its not AMDs focus right now but have the ability to spend even more cash on a CPU upgrade in a few years as the current one didn't have enough performance to last.
You want a laugh? My 6700k system (from OCUK) was 7 years old last month if the paperwork is to be believed.Not true, I upgraded my 6400 to a 6700k a year or two back for £75 and performance was much improved and all I had to do was reinstall the chip and the heatsink. Maybe a minority but not no-one.
Only trouble is the upgrade cost was near the original difference in price making me wish I'd gone higher end originally.
Those chips are/were great. Big step forward from the couple of gens before!You want a laugh? My 6700k system (from OCUK) was 7 years old last month if the paperwork is to be believed.
I stumbled upon that black document sleeve they issue with your order and my jaw hit the floor. I had it in my head it was maybe 5 or 6 years at a stretch
All I've really done aside from making sure it was thoroughly clean (no dust bunnies) is put a 1080ti in at some point, add a bit more memory and change/add to the storage.
Main gain for 13th gen is ~5ghz (or more) on all cores, for the 13600K and above. Zen 4 does the same thing, but for all models (although 7600X not so cheap at launch...).
The main ppl who will gain will be those who buy mid end CPUs (priced around $300?).
Lets compare rocket lakes $262 11600k vs the $300 5600XOK, this statement is just outright horse manure even by your standards.
If you think Ryzen 7000 doesn't have "enough performance to last" which will require you buying a new CPU and CPU only in a few years, then Raptor Lake sure as sugar isn't going to have "enough performance to last" and will require an entirely new platform when you "need" to upgrade.
Honestly, how do you even take yourself seriously with this nonsense?
Rocket Lake will be DOA. multithreaded performance already beaten by Zen 2, probably single core performance parity with Zen 3.
Zen 4 will be priced to compete with Intel's locked chips. All core clock on these is 5.3ghz for the 13900, 5.1ghz for the 13700. The locked chips are similar to the all core clocks of the best 12th gen chips.12th gen does 5gig or more.
13th gen should be 5.4-5.5 plus.
How so? The 13600K is way faster than the 7600x in mt and i know for a fact those ecores give a huge boost to some games, like spiderman hitman 3 etc. So it is very likely the 13600k will have way more longevity.OK, this statement is just outright horse manure even by your standards.
If you think Ryzen 7000 doesn't have "enough performance to last" which will require you buying a new CPU and CPU only in a few years, then Raptor Lake sure as sugar isn't going to have "enough performance to last" and will require an entirely new platform when you "need" to upgrade.
Honestly, how do you even take yourself seriously with this nonsense?
Of course on the other hand am5 is upgradable, so 5 years from now you can get a 10600x that will perform as well as the 13600k, but then the question is why not just buy the 13600k now and be done with it?
What exactly do you find objectionable to what I said? Not even joking, can you pinpoint it?You see, it is when you make statements like that you can tell you have an agenda, rather than just presenting facts. It's no wonder you end up getting banned from threads tbh.