• Notice regarding image hosts and attachments. See here.

Rather obvious question

Associate
Joined
16 Nov 2012
Posts
252
Hi guys.

I'm currently running a 3770K @ 4.4ghz with Kingston Value RAM - (2x8gb, 1600mhz, 11-11-11-27, non-xmp, 1.5v). GPU is GTX670 @ 1320mhz, using twin Hyper3K SSDs in RAID0 for Windows and applications.

Now, I'm guessing there's no point overclocking that RAM. I mainly do web browsing, gaming, programming and a little bit of Photoshop but not a great deal. I do tend to have a lot of things running at a time though.

Would I notice much if any difference from getting some faster memory? Was eying up some Patriot Viper Black Mamba 2133mhz stuff that I could run at 2400mhz.

I've never really bothered going for fast RAM, but most of my other components are quick so I wondered if this was a bottleneck at all.

Thanks guys!
 
Last edited:
I do run virtual machines fairly often and I use a RAM disk so I do need more than 8gb really.

I used to just run 8gb but I did fill it up with the amount of stuff I run at once :p.

I don't mind paying for 16gb of Samsung Green if that's the way to go... I was just wondering about the performance/stability hit of filling my RAM slots.
 
if your currently being slowed down by the ram running out then yea buy some more ram and you may aswell get a slightly faster speed. 1600mhz is the best spot, 1866mhz is decent too

I've currently got 16gb of 1600mhz :p. I'm wondering if there's any real difference to be found in going for 2133mhz or 2400mhz. I've seen that people spend money on RAM, but other than just saying "yeah its fast memory", I've never seen many real world results.
 
Fair enough then, that makes good sense, thanks for that :)

So, not worth upgrading for me then? I wondered if the high latency but average speed of mine was a bad thing. I basically just went out and bought the cheapest memory Kingston made :p.
 
Back
Top Bottom