• Competitor rules

    Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.

Real tangible difference between i7 and i5 at same fps?

Soldato
Joined
18 May 2010
Posts
23,336
Location
London
Lets just forget about DX12 for a second, which supposedly will favour cores over clockspeed.

What I'm trying to work out is, is there any real world difference between two cpus one with more threads/cores and one with less threads/cores but both deliver the same fps?

Looking at benchmarks doesn't give me a real feel for if there is difference. The problem is you look at benchmarks and they show that tow different cpu architectures both get the same fps, so is there a real tangible difference?

Take this as an example:

5820k with a 980 = 45fps in a particular game
3570k with a 980 = 45fps in a particular game

Would you notice any difference between the feel of the game?

I'm trying to determine if I should upgrade my 3570k to a 6770k or a 5820k (with a 970).
 
A great video here. Their channel is very good, I recommend subscribing.

https://youtu.be/WZ_5p9wd2dk

https://youtu.be/JWxncqbe1H8

The answer is, even with trying to achieve a CPU bound scenario, the difference isn't much. At more normal settings, there is even less of a difference.

I'll check the videos out on a sec.

As an example, I've been watching videos on you tube of other people 5820k's. I saw one video which showed that the Witcher 3 scaled across 6 core of the 5820k. Meaning my 3570k is holding the 970 back as it has 2 less physical cores.

However if both GPU's are the same and the fps is comparable, is there any real world difference?
 
Back
Top Bottom