• Competitor rules

    Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.

Real Temp - New temp program for Intel Core processors

Permabanned
Joined
19 Jun 2007
Posts
10,717
Location
InURmama
Quoted :
This is the first public release of Real Temp which is a temperature monitoring program designed for all Intel single Core, dual Core and quad Core processors. Each core on these processors has a digital thermal sensor (DTS) that reports temperature data relative to TjMax which is the safe maximum operating core temperature for the CPU. As your CPU heats up, your Distance to TjMax will decrease. If it reaches zero your processor will start to throttle or slow down so obviously maximizing your distance away from TjMax will help your computer to run at full speed and more reliably too.

Other software like CoreTemp has taken this knowledge and tried to work backwards to convert DTS data to an absolute temperature which most users are more comfortable with and would like to compare.

If the DTS is reading 50 then you know you are 50 degrees away from the throttling point. If the maximum safe operating temperature for your processor (TjMax) is 85C and you are 50 degrees away then your processor must be running at an absolute temperature of 35C.

Absolute Temperature = TjMax - DTS

The formula is dead simple and you don't have to be smarter than a 5th grader to figure it out but there is one small problem.

Intel does not publicly document what TjMax is for desktop processors. TjMax is fully documented for their Mobile processors but not for their desktop Core processors. Without this reference point, your absolute temperature data could be meaningless. Intel has also confirmed that there is no secret bit hidden in these chips that a programmer can read to determine what TjMax really is. The only thing a programmer can do is guess at TjMax and if he gets lucky and the reported temps look more or less believable then everyone is happy. "



realtempjv5.png




You can read the rest at URL bellow. :)



http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/showthread.php?t=179044
 
I'm running Vista Ultimate x64 (SP1) and CoreTemp 0.96.1 works without problem for me. I haven't tried it in Vista x86 but I assume it will work there as well. For 0.95.6 I had to download a "special" x64 download which contained a .bat file to run before running the executable (I forget the link, doing a websearch for 'CoreTemp x64' should give you what you want if you're running Vista x64).

Real Temp looks interesting - I will try it once there is Vista x64 support.

Hmm you seem to have that backwards m8, Coretemp does not work in Vista64 without rebooting and choosing no driver signing option or using a Batch file to load Coretemp.
 
No, I spoke to the Maker of Core Temp over MSN, he said that his basing of the TJMax came from some Intel documents yet Intel have never publically released these documents so I'm questioning the credibility of that. Not sure about other programs. But it's stone cold fact the chips throttle at 95c as this is what the guy tested with.

The TJMax does not vary it is a fixed value.

i.e The TJMax will never vary for the E8000 series they will always throttle at that temperature it's just a case of finding out which, which is what Real Temp guy has done.

The info above claims, the makers or Core Temp are guessing the info for the desktop CPU's, going by info they got for Mobile CPU's.
 
I thought TAT Intels and was leaked and Intel didnt want it to be ( I could be talking about someting else, Im from an AMD background till 6months ago).

Please input cause I know I read somewhere here about an app peeps use thats was leaked from Intel.
 
Back
Top Bottom