Really Poor Folding WU..

BigDom

BigDom

BigDom

Associate
Joined
30 Nov 2002
Posts
1,851
Location
Birmingham
I seem to have a really bad Folding WU and wondered if thee is much one can do abou tit?

GBGromacs
Project 2096
178 points...

ETA to finish... 6d10h at 4%
By comparision on the same PC but other core
Project 2106 15h26m at 74% (less than 3 days total).
 
Yep SSE boost appears to be working. I'm going to drop the WU on an old XP processor and just let it munch it.

Project : 2096
Core : GBGromacs
Frames : 100
Credit : 178


-- Dom - C2 --

Min. Time / Frame : 32mn 09s - 79.73 ppd
Avg. Time / Frame : 1h 38mn 04s - 26.14 ppd

[14:12:00] Folding@Home GB Gromacs Core
[14:12:00] Version 1.90 (March 8, 2006)
[14:12:00]
[14:12:00] Preparing to commence simulation
[14:12:00] - Assembly optimizations manually forced on.
[14:12:00] - Not checking prior termination.
[14:12:01] - Expanded 16725 -> 142191 (decompressed 850.1 percent)
[14:12:01]
[14:12:01] Project: 2096 (Run 27, Clone 12, Gen 2)
[14:12:01]
[14:12:01] Assembly optimizations on if available.
[14:12:01] Entering M.D.
[14:12:21] (Starting from checkpoint)
[14:12:21] Protein: p2096_A21_agbnp_amber99
[14:12:21]
[14:12:21] Writing local files
[14:12:21] GB activated
[14:12:21] Completed 24103 out of 4000000 steps (1)
[14:12:21] Extra SSE boost OK.


That core appears to be the one that usually get's hampered by other uses (gaming etc.) BUT all other projects average at least 60-70, usually 80ish with a peak of anything up to about 140.
 
Last edited:
Project : 2096
Core : GBGromacs
Frames : 100
Credit : 178


-- PWU --

Min. Time / Frame : 38mn 41s - 66.26 ppd
Avg. Time / Frame : 38mn 41s - 66.26 ppd


Go Figure....
 
I'll leave it' it's a cruncher I don't use much and just get it out of the way. Just stranger a XP1800 is close in performance to one core on my 3800+... May well be quicker on an intel but too much hassle to swap :)
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom