I don't know about you but I love a fry-up. Occasionally. So occasionally that I can't remember the last time I had one, it must have been months ago. The reason being I work in an office, lead a sedantry lifestyle and only need a small amount of food for breakfast. As much as I would love a fry-up most mornings I don't have one because a] it's expensive b] I'd get terribly fat and c] I worry about the long-term effects.
This article in The Times got me thinking about it, is it really only "stupid" people who eat fried breakfasts regularly? I wouldn't use the term 'stupid', I'd split it between very active people and people wantonly ignorant of their effects. I'm sure there are many intelligent people who have fry-ups regularly but who choose to ignore the health risks.
Generally fried brekfasts do seem to be eating regularly by the working class, especially builders [before anyone jumps down my throat I'm not looking down on people of different 'classes' only making observations]. But a lot of those builders can work off 2000 calories in one morning... however, as the article says, not everyone does. I would agree about fried breakfasts being generally for the working class though, I can't remember the last time I saw anyone - or knew anyone - middle class who had them.
I know some people are going to ask me to 'define' working class. This is a bit of a sore point for me since I had a girlfriend years ago who was very proud of her working class roots. She lived in a poor area of London and her family were Communists. I spent a lot of time being derided for being middle class [glad I'm out of that relationship] and it led me to question what the whole class system meant as well as being very aware of how relative the definitions were. As a lot of people will tell you, being working class is not about what job you have, where you live or how much you earn. It's about your background, interests, state of mind. Of course the original definition of the term came literally from "the workers". So.. in order to simplify the definition, let's go with that. So is it really the case? Do lots of middle class people eat fried breakfasts? Or is it more of a thing for the more active working man?
This article in The Times got me thinking about it, is it really only "stupid" people who eat fried breakfasts regularly? I wouldn't use the term 'stupid', I'd split it between very active people and people wantonly ignorant of their effects. I'm sure there are many intelligent people who have fry-ups regularly but who choose to ignore the health risks.
Generally fried brekfasts do seem to be eating regularly by the working class, especially builders [before anyone jumps down my throat I'm not looking down on people of different 'classes' only making observations]. But a lot of those builders can work off 2000 calories in one morning... however, as the article says, not everyone does. I would agree about fried breakfasts being generally for the working class though, I can't remember the last time I saw anyone - or knew anyone - middle class who had them.
I know some people are going to ask me to 'define' working class. This is a bit of a sore point for me since I had a girlfriend years ago who was very proud of her working class roots. She lived in a poor area of London and her family were Communists. I spent a lot of time being derided for being middle class [glad I'm out of that relationship] and it led me to question what the whole class system meant as well as being very aware of how relative the definitions were. As a lot of people will tell you, being working class is not about what job you have, where you live or how much you earn. It's about your background, interests, state of mind. Of course the original definition of the term came literally from "the workers". So.. in order to simplify the definition, let's go with that. So is it really the case? Do lots of middle class people eat fried breakfasts? Or is it more of a thing for the more active working man?