Associate
- Joined
- 20 Jul 2007
- Posts
- 2,160
- Location
- A sunnier or damper area than Ron-ski....
Hi all,
We've got around 6-7 main PCs around the house - two high end PCs in our office, but we also have others scattered around the place (eg in my sewing room, workshop, garden Room, lounge etc).
I find it's a bit of a chore keeping all the PCs up to date and often if find myself needing to install software on the PC I'm using as I haven't done it on this.
So, sorry if this is a very stupid question, but could I keep two powerful PCs in my office and then remote connect to them through lots of thin clients around the house?
All the PCs are wired ethernet, so don't think that should be a problem - are there any downsides to this approach?
It feels like I'd be able to just install things once and be done with it?
We've got around 6-7 main PCs around the house - two high end PCs in our office, but we also have others scattered around the place (eg in my sewing room, workshop, garden Room, lounge etc).
I find it's a bit of a chore keeping all the PCs up to date and often if find myself needing to install software on the PC I'm using as I haven't done it on this.
So, sorry if this is a very stupid question, but could I keep two powerful PCs in my office and then remote connect to them through lots of thin clients around the house?
All the PCs are wired ethernet, so don't think that should be a problem - are there any downsides to this approach?
It feels like I'd be able to just install things once and be done with it?

I agree on proper screen and keyboard really. Don't even like using a mouse much but touchpads are awful.