Renowned journalist resigns in protest of attacks on press freedom

mmj_uk

mmj_uk

mmj_uk

Caporegime
Joined
26 Dec 2003
Posts
25,666
https://www.theguardian.com/media/2020/oct/29/journalist-glenn-greenwald-resigns-the-intercept

Basically, a journalist called Glenn Greenwald wanted to cover the Biden scandal that social media have been actively suppressing, mainstream media have black holed and OCUK locked the thread I made on but he wasn't allowed to, so he has resigned in protest.

We keep hearing that Trump is attacking the freedom of the corporate mainstream media but here we have evidence of the corporations themselves attacking the freedom of their own journalists.

Have modern journalists just become glorified script readers for billionaires?
 
wesimmo said:
Theres no evidence there ever was a laptop. Just tall stories from liars.
Click to expand...

There was never any evidence of Russia collusion but it didn't stop the corporate media giving 24/7 coverage of it and speculating for 3 years? Adam Schiff, the guy who started the claim that the information allegedly from Hunter Biden's laptop is Russian disinformation (which has already been rubbished by the FBI and others) is the same person who was in numerous televised interviews a few years ago saying that he has personally seen evidence of Trump/Russia collusion, if that's the case why didn't he share any of it with Mueller's team and why should we believe what he says this time?

Why the double standard from the corporate media and social media? is it just coincidence that they are mostly all Democrat party donors? if it's all bunk then why don't they just do their jobs, investigate it and disprove it? why ignore and actively suppress it? could they possibly want someone in the Whitehouse who can be blackmailed/bought?
 
Last edited:
Remember Trump was impeached by the Democrats because they claimed he was threatening Ukraine with withholding money if Ukraine didn't investigate the firing of a prosecutor investigating Hunter Biden and Buresma, the Democrats claimed it was an abuse of power even though there was never actually any threat made by Trump (he released the phone call). The corporate media covered these claims of a "quid pro quo" involving Trump extensively.

Here Biden is admitting to threatening Ukraine with having money withheld if they didn't fire the prosecutor investigating his son and Buresma:

Why is the corporate media not even investigating it? is the video Russian disinformation? pretty good CGI if so.
 
Last edited:
There are widespread reports of voter fraud including machines flipping votes due to a software bug and the corporate media are refusing to even acknowledge it, just as they did with Hunter Biden's laptop and the dodgy dealings it exposed. Social media are actively censoring these reports.

If Joe Biden really wants national unity isn't it in his interest for the corporate media to do a bit of journalism and set minds at ease? How can the corporate media spend 3 years pushing a Russia collusion conspiracy claiming that they interfered in the 2016 election but then after pushing insecure mail-in voting now claim without question that voter fraud is impossible and it's the cleanest election ever?
 
There are numerous videos like this currently doing the rounds:


If you look at the Pennsylvania vote count at the bottom exactly 19,958 votes get flipped from Trump to Biden.

Trump goes from 1,690,589 to 1,670,631.
Biden goes from 1,252,537 to 1,272,495.

What are the odds? I wonder if they are using the same software mentioned in my previous video where 6000 votes were flipped due to a 'bug'.

I supposed you could argue that the video is either fake or corrections were being made but it's worth investigating no? where are the mainstream journalists covering it like they did Russia's alleged involvement in 2016? most of them refuse to even acknowledge that the election was possibly interfered with despite 3-4 years of 24/7 coverage saying just that about 2016. Real journalism is dead in the corporate media.

The corporate media seem happy to cover stories where their is zero evidence just as long as it stuck the knife in Trump but when you have something substantial (Hunter Biden's laptop/emails) or reports of rigging this election they turn a blind eye.
 
This is what modern corporate media passes for:

2016: 24/7 speculation about how Trump stole the election with help from Russia.
2017: 24/7 speculation about how Trump stole the election with help from Russia.
2018: 24/7 speculation about how Trump stole the election with help from Russia.
2019: 24/7 speculation about how Trump stole the election with help from Russia.

A 2-3 year investigation finds nothing of any significance.

2020: According to the same corporate media this election is 100% legit and they aren't even going to entertain claims that it wasn't, it was totally secure and impossible to corrupt in any way. Anyone who questions the legitimacy or calls for greater scrutiny of this particular election is just a conspiracy theorist and/or sore loser.

How can you push a Russia election interference narrative for 3-4 years and then just immediately say that the most recent election is absolutely unquestionable whilst censoring and ignoring evidence that shows things like poll watchers being obstructed/prevented from observing, software glitches and dead people having voted due to mail-in? not to mention key swing states taking an abnormally long time to count votes.

Would we be hearing the same story from the media if they had projected Trump to win?

How can people still take them seriously? it's pretty blatant that they have a huge bias.
 
Fancy that, the corporate media are willing to acknowledge Biden family corruption involving China and Ukraine now that it appears he has won the election and will be immune to any prosecution. Isn't not reporting and even censoring something because it hurts a particular party election interference?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom