Saw this BBC article at lunch today and thought I remembered the case, though the article seems to miss out details reported elsewhere:
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-31930196
The girl in question made a rape accusation, the case was dropped through lack of evidence, the defendant took out a private prosecution against his accuser which was taken over by the CPS and later she tragically committed suicide.
Reading that article alone would make you wonder how on earth the CPS could let this happen, an alleged rapist who they couldn't prosecute through lack of evidence drags his alleged victim through a private prosecution which the CPS then takes over culminating in her suicide.
Problem is that despite the BBC quoting a tiny irrelevant part of the CPS press release:
http://www.cps.gov.uk/news/latest_news/eleanor_de_freitas/
they have decided to omit the rather more important details - namely that not only was there no evidence of a rape taking place but that there was rather significant evidence that this young lady suffering from bipolar disorder had falsified her account (apparently contradicted by SMS messages and CCTV footage)
Doesn't seem quite so unreasonable for the CPS to have prosecuted after all, and a note re: the grumbling from some in the police
Though the CPS press release doesn't go into specifics regarding the evidence some of it has been reported elsewhere.
There was actually footage of her shopping in Ann summers with her 'attacker' the next day hugging and kissing him. She had sent text messages to a friend in the morning saying she's had 'the best sex of my life'.
The whole thing was sparked by her 'harassing' the alleged 'attacker' resulting in him going to the police to report the harassment, which ended up in him spending the night in the cells as a 'rapist'.
The alleged attacker took out the private prosecution because he'd been named and shamed, wanted to clear his name and the police seemingly weren't interested in investigating the false accusations. Also the suicide as a result of the trial might well have been partly down to her not wanting certain things about her part time work as an escort/erotic masseuse being revealed in court.
Doesn't actually seem too unreasonable of the CPS after all, in fact one question that should be asked is why the police didn't investigate the false accusations in the first place. And why is the BBC still seemingly omitting the full facts when reporting the case - sure they can leave the details of her escort work to the daily mail but reporting that the CPS actually had a rather strong case against her would seem to be very relevant.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-31930196
The girl in question made a rape accusation, the case was dropped through lack of evidence, the defendant took out a private prosecution against his accuser which was taken over by the CPS and later she tragically committed suicide.
Reading that article alone would make you wonder how on earth the CPS could let this happen, an alleged rapist who they couldn't prosecute through lack of evidence drags his alleged victim through a private prosecution which the CPS then takes over culminating in her suicide.
Ms de Freitas' solicitors asked the CPS to halt the private action but instead the CPS decided to take it over and continue it.
She said she feared her alleged attacker would be free to reoffend, it heard.
Problem is that despite the BBC quoting a tiny irrelevant part of the CPS press release:
http://www.cps.gov.uk/news/latest_news/eleanor_de_freitas/
'The director of public prosecutions Alison Saunders had described the case as "one of the most difficult" she had seen.'
they have decided to omit the rather more important details - namely that not only was there no evidence of a rape taking place but that there was rather significant evidence that this young lady suffering from bipolar disorder had falsified her account (apparently contradicted by SMS messages and CCTV footage)
However, the evidence in this case was strong and having considered it in light of all of our knowledge and guidance on prosecuting sexual offences and allegedly false rape claims, it is clear there was sufficient evidence for a realistic prospect of conviction for perverting the course of justice. This was evidence including text messages and CCTV footage that directly contradicted the account Ms de Freitas gave to the police. This was not assumption based on her behaviour or actions which fall into myths and stereotypes about how alleged rape victims should behave. It was on this basis that we concluded that there was a realistic prospect of proving that the rape allegation made by Ms de Freitas was false, and there was also a strong public interest in prosecuting due to the seriousness of the alleged offence which was maintained by the defendant for some time and which led to the arrest of an individual.
Doesn't seem quite so unreasonable for the CPS to have prosecuted after all, and a note re: the grumbling from some in the police
There has been speculation that the police did not agree with the prosecution for various reasons. However, the police never undertook an investigation into the alleged perverting the course of justice nor did they consider all the material provided to us by the private prosecution. They were therefore not in a position to form a view on whether there was sufficient evidence to prosecute.
Though the CPS press release doesn't go into specifics regarding the evidence some of it has been reported elsewhere.
There was actually footage of her shopping in Ann summers with her 'attacker' the next day hugging and kissing him. She had sent text messages to a friend in the morning saying she's had 'the best sex of my life'.
The whole thing was sparked by her 'harassing' the alleged 'attacker' resulting in him going to the police to report the harassment, which ended up in him spending the night in the cells as a 'rapist'.
The alleged attacker took out the private prosecution because he'd been named and shamed, wanted to clear his name and the police seemingly weren't interested in investigating the false accusations. Also the suicide as a result of the trial might well have been partly down to her not wanting certain things about her part time work as an escort/erotic masseuse being revealed in court.
Doesn't actually seem too unreasonable of the CPS after all, in fact one question that should be asked is why the police didn't investigate the false accusations in the first place. And why is the BBC still seemingly omitting the full facts when reporting the case - sure they can leave the details of her escort work to the daily mail but reporting that the CPS actually had a rather strong case against her would seem to be very relevant.