Retouching an old photo

Caporegime
Joined
18 Oct 2002
Posts
28,427
Location
London
My girlfriend's mother would like an old photo restored, as you can see the colours are washed out. I offered to do it, very limited PS experience, but I do not know the scope of the work. There is no point of me doing it if it's very difficult and I do bodged job. So can someone please give me an idea or if it is a 5 second job for the more experience, have a go at it. Many thanks :)

1zeflhe.jpg

I have the original photo and digital copy (scanned at 800 dpi, 186MB BMP).
 
Well I'm afraid there's not much to work with there.

Even a large scan cannot insert information to recover that isn't there in the first place.

It's a simple task to fix the scratches and marks around the edges but I can't see (without some significant effort and artistry) the colours ever being anything but washed out I'm afraid.

I'd personally look at fixing the marks, convert it to B&W, sharpen it up slightly and add a white border which will give the impression of it being brighter than it actually is.
 
Poo bum, I hoped the colour restoration wouldn't be too much hassle. It's the colours she is more interested in.
 
Well unless there is some method of fixing those colours I'm not aware of, sorting the colours out would mean re-painting them in and while there are people that do that, those skills don't come cheap.
 
uso6.jpg


That's just messing around with a few filters but it's not too good. I've seen someone in GD restore some colours to an old picture in one of those silly threads but not done it myself.
 
Columbo's suggestion is the way forward for this.
Fix it up and convert to Black & White; with some sharpening and contrast it will look a much cleaner and brighter photo.

There isn't really much you can do about the colours, aside from essentially treating it almost like a painting and building up layers of colour to create something which looks less faded. That is time consuming and also might not mirror how it originally looked, plus its really not worth it for the photo.
 
Thanks for the two attempts. Would it be possible to email you a more high quality version for recolouring rather than a compressed <100Kb print screen?
 
Thanks for the two attempts. Would it be possible to email you a more high quality version for recolouring rather than a compressed <100Kb print screen?

I can try the same with a higher quality image if you like but the result will probably be similar. How large is the file going to be?
 
One method that can work is to create a new Levels adjustment. Click on the menu drop down and select Auto Options. In that window, choose Enhance Per Channel Contrast and Snap Neutral Midtones. You should then see a good approximation of the original colours. That will give you an image that you can then work with:

oldpic.jpg


Note that you should do your basic repair work first, i.e. use the healing brush to paint the bricks back in and remove fly-spots, etc.

You can then insert a new layer and paint the skin tones back in. It doesn't have to be too accurate as, once done, you can set the blend mode to Colour and your paints will be merged into the original. If it looks to harsh, select the Hue/Saturation adjustment and tone down the Saturation a little. Here I've added a very light pink colour to prevent the face and hands looking too pasty:

oldpic3.jpg


Use a similar technique to remove the purple fringing on the glass doors, around the hair, and to balance up the unfaded portion of the trousers:

oldpic1.jpg


Anyway, that took about 3 minutes so it gives you an idea of what you can do with a little more time. Using a copy of your original scan will give also you better results.
 
Cosimo - the file is 186MB but I didn't really fiddle with the settings as I was pressed for time. The 3 in 1 scanner in my office goes up to 1200dpi, should I try that? What is the best format in this situation? BMP, TIFF, PNG or JPEG?

I will scan again but may try glosrfc's method as it will encourage me to use PS and learn myself. If it all goes pear shaped, expect an email from me :p.

Thanks for you all your help guys. Boyfriend brownie points for me :p:D:o
 
Cosimo - the file is 186MB but I didn't really fiddle with the settings as I was pressed for time. The 3 in 1 scanner in my office goes up to 1200dpi, should I try that? What is the best format in this situation? BMP, TIFF, PNG or JPEG?

I will scan again but may try glosrfc's method as it will encourage me to use PS and learn myself. If it all goes pear shaped, expect an email from me :p.

Thanks for you all your help guys. Boyfriend brownie points for me :p:D:o

TIFF if you want to preserve every bit of info from a scanned image but in this case JPEG will probably suffice.
 
Pretty sure email will compress it, uploading it to a site like flickr would be best.

Flickr has a 200mb limit per photo. Email systems do have limits for attachment size. Gmail has a 25mb limit unless you use it in conjunction with Google Drive. You could also use Dropbox for the image.
 
If your scanner can save to RAW do that, otherwise save to TIFF as that's more compatible with most sofware on Windows and Mac. It's also lossless so it will preserve more of the original detail.

The DPI determines the physical size of the image. If you want to print the final image, use a DPI around 300 as that's compatible with most printers. You'd only use a higher DPI if you're planning on enlarging the picture later. I'm guessing the original picture is probably 6x4 inches. To give you an idea, scanning at 300 DPI will give you an image that's 1800x1200 pixels when you import it into Photoshop. At 1200 DPI, it will be 7200x4800 pixels which is way too big - with a 300 DPI printer, that equates to 24x16 inches in size! And most of the additional info will be discarded by the printer/Photoshop when you scale it back down to the original 6x4 inch print size.

If you just want an image for use on the web, use a DPI of 100. Again, a 6x4 inch image will produce a 600 x 400 pixel, or lifesize, image which will be fine.

If you can control the bit-depth, use the highest value. This is more important than the DPI as it determines the number of bits used per pixel, and therefore the depth of colour that can be retrieved from the scan.

You should be able to get a smaller filesize - I suspect the 800 DPI has bumped it up significantly. Again a comparison - a 6x4 inch print at 300 DPI gives you an 1800x1200 image size or just over 2 million pixels in that file or 6.4Mb colour filesize. The same image at 1200 DPI = a 7200x4800 pixel image or more than 34 million pixels - a whopping 103.6Mb file. In simple terms, each time you double the DPI resolution, you multiply the pixels (and therefore the filesize) by a factor of 4.

Another cause of excessive filesize is if you scanned the entire surface of the scanner bed, and then cut out the portion that contains the picture before posting it here. There's usually an option with your scanning software to preview first - this scans the entire bed - and then you can use the mouse to draw a marque around that portion you want to keep. The scanner will then do another pass at the higher resolutions you've dictated but the filesize will be consequently smaller. With 300DPI and a 6x4 print, a TIFF file should be around 6-7Mb or so.

Other tips:
  • Clean the photo first by using a lens blower to get rid of any dust. Do the same with the scanner. Far easier to remove the dust first than to record it in the scan and labouriously remove it afterwards.
  • Always scan in colour, even black and white images.
  • Don't bother trying to set the picture straight in the scanner - use Photoshop's Ruler tool and Image Rotation to straighten it up later. It's usually best to leave a slight margin around the picture when you scan as it makes it easier to draw the marque for the final version.
  • As mentioned above - regardless of what "resolution" your printer manufacturer claims to be, stick to a scanned DPI of 300. Otherwise use 100DPI for the web.
  • It's usually best to ignore any scaling options with your scanner software. If you want to scale, do it later in Photoshop.
  • Similarly ignore any other options such as interpolation

If you need further help, just ask - I've only just finished scanning and fixing over 100 old photo's for a genealogy project so I'm pretty familiar with the techniques now.

Summarising your basic scan settings:
  • Save to TIFF
  • Scan at a resolution for the intended output (300 DPI print or 100DPI screen)
  • Scaling 100%
  • Descreening No
  • Interpolation No
  • Scan to Colour or RGB
 
Your best bet might be to convert ti to B&W and then colour it yourself using PS. I did something like this a while ago whilst trying to get used to PS. If you know the colours of everything it could be the best option for you.

You can get some awesome results... There are quite a few old war images which have been colorised with great success... worth a shot?
 
I wouldn't go the B&W recolour route just yet, most of the picture is fine just needs some levels work and some colour balance. I think you may need to go to recolouring on the skin and jackets, though it might be salvagable with masking off the midtones areas and darkening them a lot to bring them back. Though you may still have too much white area.

Best idea I think would be scan the photo as suggested and post a link for us to have a go with. It has been a loooong time since I did anything more to a photo than small levels adjustment but happy to have a try.
 
Your best bet might be to convert ti to B&W and then colour it yourself using PS.

It's usually best to do this after the picture has been scanned as a colour image - even if the original is B&W. The primary reason is that many old photos contain stains on the surface of the print. In many cases you won't notice them when you look at the old print but they will appear in the scanned image. Old B&W photos also exhibit an effect known as "silvering" caused by fixer solution left on the original print. It's this "silvering" that causes old pictures to gradually fade from black to yellow/brown.

If you scan your pictures as B&W images, you effectively "cook" those stains and "silvering" defects into the output file which makes them harder to remove. By scanning them as RGB images these defects will exhibit colours that are different from those in the original. This makes them far easier to spot and remove, either by using one of the healing brushes or the sponge tool.

Also, because you've preserved the colour information by scanning it as an RGB image, you can use the individual colour Channels to isolate and correct more complex stains and "silvering" defects. Once you've removed them, you can then convert the image back to B&W in Photoshop.
 
Back
Top Bottom