So a couple have complained about Ricky Gervais making an inappropriate joke about dead babies. Sadly the couple's son was stillborn last year and going to see Ricky was the first time they'd been out since. Now obviously they were already in an emotional state and were still grieving when they heard the joke and they promptly left the show. What I find even more inappropriate is Ricky's response to the couple walking out which basically centres around "offence as the collateral damage of free speech" - article below:
http://news.sky.com/story/ricky-gervais-defends-dead-babies-joke-at-show-in-belfast-10818401
I understand the point he is making, but surely empathising with people, especially those grieving a loss, is more important than what is ultimately a laugh? I agree with the point that you shouldn't need to 'modify' your thoughts and views in case of offending someone e.g. where a discussion about different religions may involve some questions or views which could be offensive but being controversial to get a few laughs or to get yourself noticed is hardly the same.
On the other hand, would he be making these jokes if he had lost a child of his own?
I know there's been quite a lot of discussion on free speech on these forums, and one of the reasons I joined all those years ago was because of a thread on freedom of speech and Islam (it went "well") but I think some comedians try to be controversial just for the sake of it and the publicity it generates (as well as some trying to be seen as an intellectual type etc).
thoughts?
http://news.sky.com/story/ricky-gervais-defends-dead-babies-joke-at-show-in-belfast-10818401
I understand the point he is making, but surely empathising with people, especially those grieving a loss, is more important than what is ultimately a laugh? I agree with the point that you shouldn't need to 'modify' your thoughts and views in case of offending someone e.g. where a discussion about different religions may involve some questions or views which could be offensive but being controversial to get a few laughs or to get yourself noticed is hardly the same.
On the other hand, would he be making these jokes if he had lost a child of his own?
I know there's been quite a lot of discussion on free speech on these forums, and one of the reasons I joined all those years ago was because of a thread on freedom of speech and Islam (it went "well") but I think some comedians try to be controversial just for the sake of it and the publicity it generates (as well as some trying to be seen as an intellectual type etc).
thoughts?
Last edited: