Yesterday i had set my heart on purchasing the Rog Swift instead of one of the TN 4K Panels (The Acer G-Sync one to be specific).
Now today i check the website to notice Acer have a 4k IPS panel available to be pre ordered. Had this new monitor not been added to the website today, i'd have most likely already ordered the Rog Swift this morning.
I have i7 4770k and 780TI SLI. So i've read that i can probably run 4k Res at playable frame rates. However with the Acer G-Sync i was thinking about getting i figured the G-Sync would help me keep to steady frame rates.
Now the new Acer 4K IPS doesn't have G-Sync and even if they did, it'd probably add close to £200 to the price of them which would probably make it a little out of my price range to be honest anyway.
So the question is; (Which has been asked a few times before)
Which;
1. Asus Rog Swift (£599) (I've sort of sold myself on 120hz and 144hz gaming with G-Sync, i would prefer 2160p rather than 1440p but i 'should' be able to live with that.
2. Acer 4k2k TN (£499) (Comes with G-Sync which should make 4K gaming playable and those extra pixels would be great)
3. Acer 4k2k IPS (£599) (IPS looks better and i currently use a 1080p IPS screen so maybe dropping to TN would be too noticable for me? However it doesn't come with G-Sync so would this make this monitor crap to game on?)
- Please keep in mind i've never looked at a 4k monitor, nor have i played on a 120hz monitor and i also have never used G-Sync.
I also use steam in-home streaming to my Macbook Pro which is 2880x1800 so if i got the 4k monitor i could stream full res gaming to Macbook Pro in my home. If i got the Rog Swift i could still stream at 1920x1200 to my Macbook and that would be better than my current 1650x1050 that i am forced to use due to needing full screen. and 1080p leaves my macbook with black bars.
The type of games i play;
1. Titan Fall
2. Assassins Creed
3. The Crew
4. Far Cry 4
5. Civ Beyond Earth
6. Diablo
Sorry for the wall of text, just hesitant to spend so much on a display to not like it when i get it.
Thanks.
Now today i check the website to notice Acer have a 4k IPS panel available to be pre ordered. Had this new monitor not been added to the website today, i'd have most likely already ordered the Rog Swift this morning.
I have i7 4770k and 780TI SLI. So i've read that i can probably run 4k Res at playable frame rates. However with the Acer G-Sync i was thinking about getting i figured the G-Sync would help me keep to steady frame rates.
Now the new Acer 4K IPS doesn't have G-Sync and even if they did, it'd probably add close to £200 to the price of them which would probably make it a little out of my price range to be honest anyway.
So the question is; (Which has been asked a few times before)
Which;
1. Asus Rog Swift (£599) (I've sort of sold myself on 120hz and 144hz gaming with G-Sync, i would prefer 2160p rather than 1440p but i 'should' be able to live with that.
2. Acer 4k2k TN (£499) (Comes with G-Sync which should make 4K gaming playable and those extra pixels would be great)
3. Acer 4k2k IPS (£599) (IPS looks better and i currently use a 1080p IPS screen so maybe dropping to TN would be too noticable for me? However it doesn't come with G-Sync so would this make this monitor crap to game on?)
- Please keep in mind i've never looked at a 4k monitor, nor have i played on a 120hz monitor and i also have never used G-Sync.
I also use steam in-home streaming to my Macbook Pro which is 2880x1800 so if i got the 4k monitor i could stream full res gaming to Macbook Pro in my home. If i got the Rog Swift i could still stream at 1920x1200 to my Macbook and that would be better than my current 1650x1050 that i am forced to use due to needing full screen. and 1080p leaves my macbook with black bars.
The type of games i play;
1. Titan Fall
2. Assassins Creed
3. The Crew
4. Far Cry 4
5. Civ Beyond Earth
6. Diablo
Sorry for the wall of text, just hesitant to spend so much on a display to not like it when i get it.
Thanks.