• Competitor rules

    Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.

Ryzen 1700 + Extreme LLC OK?

Associate
Joined
21 Sep 2010
Posts
455
I'm trying to get 3.9GHz out of my Ryzen 1700 so I don't feel like I lost the silicone lottery (again). I'm using an ASUS Prime B350 Plus motherboard, and have set a voltage offset of +0.2V. Using HWInfo, I found that the VCCDR setting is quite a long way from the SVI TFN vcore reading, especially when under load (something like 1.41 VCCDR, 1.385 SVI TFN low load and 1.355 SVI TFN Prime95), and that the CPU was crashing on Prime95 after about 10-15 minutes. The only way to get the SVI TFN reading on high load to approach the reading on low load was to set LLC to Extreme, which then gives ~1.38V Prime95, and the system is stable for over an hour. I haven't checked VCCDR with this setting but it's probably about 1.43V.

I've heard the Extreme LLC setting is generally for LN2 and usually overvolts the CPU significantly under load, but that's not what I'm finding here - in fact it's still just below the low load voltage on HWInfo. Am I reading this situation wrong? Should I be worried about longevity with the settings I'm using here?
 
It increases the voltage to the CPU significantly when load is taken away - benchmarking with steady load it should look fine. Extreme LLC is more of a problem with real workloads than 'stability' tests that don't exercise these transitions often.

If you want a bit more chat about overshoot: https://en.wikichip.org/wiki/load-line_calibration

So the voltage while load is applied isn't what you need to worry about!
 
Last edited:
When there's no load at all the CPU is downclocking to a 15x multiplier and running a much lower voltage around 1.1V I think. I've not really monitored it under a variable load though.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom