Hi,
I have a ryzen 5 3600 cpu.
Out of curiosity I've been looking at prices of newer ryzen cpus.
Now, I admit I've not done any proper research on what's a good upgrade but what little I've done on Userbenchmark suggests the improvent on the ryzen 5 3600 against a chip twice the price is somewhere between 3% and 11%.
Eg compare the 3600 (6 core, 12 thread) with a ryzen 9 3900xt (12 core, 24 thread) , the improvement in performance is roughly 3 percent. Yet in retail shops the price of the 3900xt i(circa £410) s more than double the 3600 (circa £189).
I'm missing something here, ain't I?
How useful, even ball park accurate, is Userbenchmark?
I have a ryzen 5 3600 cpu.
Out of curiosity I've been looking at prices of newer ryzen cpus.
Now, I admit I've not done any proper research on what's a good upgrade but what little I've done on Userbenchmark suggests the improvent on the ryzen 5 3600 against a chip twice the price is somewhere between 3% and 11%.
Eg compare the 3600 (6 core, 12 thread) with a ryzen 9 3900xt (12 core, 24 thread) , the improvement in performance is roughly 3 percent. Yet in retail shops the price of the 3900xt i(circa £410) s more than double the 3600 (circa £189).
I'm missing something here, ain't I?
How useful, even ball park accurate, is Userbenchmark?