• Competitor rules

    Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.

Ryzen R5 CPU's, anyone considering one?

Soldato
Joined
30 Jan 2007
Posts
15,485
Location
PA, USA (Orig UK)
So I was looking at the upcoming R5's, and the 1600 (6 core, 12 thread) looks pretty interesting if you are prepared to overclock.

I don't think I'm prepared to drop to a 4 core chips (2+2 config), but the 6 core seems a reasonable price/performance balance. Obviously I'd love an 8 core lol, but money any growing on trees as buying a house at the moment.

Silly to consider a six core? Is anyone able to disable 1 core on each side and do testing?
 
The only thing putting me off really are the ram issues (limited overclocking of memory without clock gens)
 
One of the interesting things I noticed from the Adored video was his observation of if you run anything other than just a game, then a 7700k will start to stutter even though the frame rate is higher. The R7 did not have this issue, and brings hope to the R5 with 6 cores as well. (This was worst case scenario though with Fallout 4).

I'm just struggling to justify a 200 to 300 MB PURELY for the reason that I want a clock gen for the memory. Literally, this is the only reason I wouldn't get a cheaper board right now.
 
Would have been very interesting to see a single CCX quad with 8MB L3 cache to see how it performed.

There does very much seem to be a point at present where the frequency of the chip does nothing, and something else is bottlenecking it.

I am really hoping that for gaming the 6 core chips don't lose too much performance compared to the 8 core. I know it won't be "the best" but whatever I get will be a big step up from my overclocked APU and hopefully better than my old overclocked 2500k.
 
Guaranteed clocks no hassle = 1600X. Prepared to do some work and get better value = 1600.

And yes... same question as amigafan2003... source of the single CCX chip news please? (I read elsewhere that AMD had said the upcoming R5's would all be 2 + 2, 3 + 3 etc... no 'funny business' as they put it.
 
Looking at the R5 1400, that only has 8MB L3 cache, even though it was reported that all the R5 would be split designs, I do have to wonder if this will be a single CCX chip.?
 
Back
Top Bottom