Poll: Sack Race 2014/15

Who's getting it?


  • Total voters
    214
Soldato
Joined
23 Feb 2004
Posts
3,879
Location
Manchester
Never got the chance to post this last season and still lack enough time to list all of the Premier Leagues 20 managers and respective teams, but there's no stopping you from voicing your opinion.

So I pose the question...Who is your favourite for being the first PL manager to get the chop this season?

The likes of Monk at Swansea and Lambert at Villa must be amongst the bookies favourites...
 
Aye Aston Villa have five games in a row against top teams just after the start of the season as well. It'll make or break them. He'll be gone before October is out I reckon.
 
I'll go with Harry Redknapp, it's probably a long shot but I fancy that if QPR get off to another poor start their owner will panic and feel compelled to act.
 
Which leagues? How much does Berlus****face love Inzaghi. Seedorf got 35 points in the league in 19 games compared to the previous guy they fired who got 22 points over the first 19 games. They improved drastically, were doing well and they fired him to appoint a youth team manager with no proof he could do well and Seedorf who had just done exceptionally well for 6 months. Either way, AC look a complete disaster currently, only preseason but their performances have been basically shocking.

For firing Seedorf to bring in that utter **** Inzaghi, I'd quite love it if they failed miserably.
 
I'll go with Harry Redknapp, it's probably a long shot but I fancy that if QPR get off to another poor start their owner will panic and feel compelled to act.

This could be true.. If he was sacked Glenn Hoddle is already being primed as his replacement.
 

They'd be mad to let him go. WBA struggled to find a manager recently and had to settle with Irvine, so I don't doubt that Palace would find it difficult to attract a manager with any serious credibility and credentials in the Premier League should Pulis move on. Let him spend some cash - he didn't do it too recklessly at Stoke!
 
He did buy Chamakh though... :p

It was Hollway who signed him, not Pulis.

However, who got the best out of Chamakh, Wenger or Pulis?

Also, didn't they manage to negotiate an excellent deal with him whereby he dropped from his high wage level at Arsenal in order to join. Our owner's belief, which I think is probably correct, is that he doesn't care how many goals a striker scores during the season. The only thing that matters is the result and where you finish in the league.

Palace patched together a team which survived comfortably, and Pulis was certainly responsible for that survival! :)
 
It was Hollway who signed him, not Pulis.

However, who got the best out of Chamakh, Wenger or Pulis?

Also, didn't they manage to negotiate an excellent deal with him whereby he dropped from his high wage level at Arsenal in order to join. Our owner's belief, which I think is probably correct, is that he doesn't care how many goals a striker scores during the season. The only thing that matters is the result and where you finish in the league.

Palace patched together a team which survived comfortably, and Pulis was certainly responsible for that survival! :)

I stand corrected, totally forgot about Holloway! Not arguing that Pulis is a decent enough manager, I don't particularly enjoy the style of football he had Stoke playing but it was effective and for most clubs/managers that's probably all they care about. I didn't catch much of last season at all so I'm not that sure how Chamakh panned out for Palace but he was woeful for us. Probably happy to accept a wage drop in order to play regular football, I'm not sure why they couldn't have taken him back at Bordeaux.
 
Back
Top Bottom