Hi, just had a quote for some new servers with the following spec:
Terminal Server:
HP ML370: Quad core xeon, 4gb ram, 2 * 146g hot swap sas drives, gbit lan..
Sage Server:
HP ML370: 2 * Quad core xeon, 16GB ram, 2 * 146g hot swap sas drives, gbit lan, HP SC11 controller.
Now the thing I am wondering is if the Sage server spec is too much of an overkill. Currently there are around 40 clients in one office (using sage software) and 10 clients in the other office (Remote access via Citrix). I personally don't know enough about Sage software to know if it warrants 16GB of ram and 2 quad core cpu's (I do realise MS SQL server is pretty resource hungry). If this is a bit of an overkill do you think one server would surfice to act as the terminal server and sage server?
Thanks!
Terminal Server:
HP ML370: Quad core xeon, 4gb ram, 2 * 146g hot swap sas drives, gbit lan..
Sage Server:
HP ML370: 2 * Quad core xeon, 16GB ram, 2 * 146g hot swap sas drives, gbit lan, HP SC11 controller.
Now the thing I am wondering is if the Sage server spec is too much of an overkill. Currently there are around 40 clients in one office (using sage software) and 10 clients in the other office (Remote access via Citrix). I personally don't know enough about Sage software to know if it warrants 16GB of ram and 2 quad core cpu's (I do realise MS SQL server is pretty resource hungry). If this is a bit of an overkill do you think one server would surfice to act as the terminal server and sage server?
Thanks!
Last edited: