Associate
I’m probably being stupid here but can someone explain the difference between these and why one costs £700 more than the other.
Looks like they have the same resolution, refresh rate, freesync/gsync compatibility etc
www.overclockers.co.uk
www.overclockers.co.uk
And then why does this one which has a much lower refresh rate cost more or less the same as the one with 240hz refresh rate ?
www.overclockers.co.uk
Feels like the second one posted is the logical one to go for right ?
Looks like they have the same resolution, refresh rate, freesync/gsync compatibility etc
Samsung 49" Odyssey NEO G9 LS49AG950NPXXU 5120x1440 VA 240Hz 1ms FreeSync/G-Sync Curved Gaming Monitor
Order Samsung 49" Odyssey NEO G9 LS49AG950NPXXU 5120x1440 VA 240Hz 1ms FreeSync/G-Sync Curved Gaming Monitor now online and benefit from fast delivery.
www.overclockers.co.uk
Samsung 49" Odyssey G9 LC49G95TSSPXXU 5120x1440 VA 240Hz 1ms FreeSync/G-Sync Curved Gaming Monitor
Order Samsung 49" Odyssey G9 LC49G95TSSPXXU 5120x1440 VA 240Hz 1ms FreeSync/G-Sync Curved Gaming Monitor now online and benefit from fast delivery.
www.overclockers.co.uk
And then why does this one which has a much lower refresh rate cost more or less the same as the one with 240hz refresh rate ?
Samsung 49" Odyssey G9 LC49RG90SSPXXU 5120x1440 VA 120Hz FreeSync QLED 32:9 Curved Gaming Monitor
Order Samsung 49" Odyssey G9 LC49RG90SSPXXU 5120x1440 VA 120Hz FreeSync QLED 32:9 Curved Gaming Monitor now online and benefit from fast delivery.
www.overclockers.co.uk
Feels like the second one posted is the logical one to go for right ?
Last edited: