Hi All,
I'm just ordering a system for my work, we require three screens running from one machine to display simple things like stats / websites - nothing 3D / Intensive.
Decided on three Samsung LE40A559P4F 40" LCDs.
For the machine I've gone for a basic Dell Optiplex with a ATI FireMV 2400 256MB DDR DVI PCI-E x1 low profile Graphics Card installed which can run upto 4 screens.
The LCD's resolution is 1920x1080 - the graphics card spec states that "The multi-view accelerator card provides 256Mb of DDR graphics memory offering the versatility of mixed resolution types and independent monitor resolutions of up to 2048 x 1536 (analog) and 1600 x 1200 (DVI)".
Should I be running this using DVI/HDMI cables at 1600x1200 or lower, or go for VGA cables and run it at 1920x1080? I know that running LCDs outside of their native resolution generally means fuzzy/uncrisp image.. or is it different for DVI/HDMI? Which method of connection would provide the best picture?
Any advice would be appriciated,
Thanks,
Ryan
I'm just ordering a system for my work, we require three screens running from one machine to display simple things like stats / websites - nothing 3D / Intensive.
Decided on three Samsung LE40A559P4F 40" LCDs.
For the machine I've gone for a basic Dell Optiplex with a ATI FireMV 2400 256MB DDR DVI PCI-E x1 low profile Graphics Card installed which can run upto 4 screens.
The LCD's resolution is 1920x1080 - the graphics card spec states that "The multi-view accelerator card provides 256Mb of DDR graphics memory offering the versatility of mixed resolution types and independent monitor resolutions of up to 2048 x 1536 (analog) and 1600 x 1200 (DVI)".
Should I be running this using DVI/HDMI cables at 1600x1200 or lower, or go for VGA cables and run it at 1920x1080? I know that running LCDs outside of their native resolution generally means fuzzy/uncrisp image.. or is it different for DVI/HDMI? Which method of connection would provide the best picture?
Any advice would be appriciated,
Thanks,
Ryan