Associate
- Joined
- 19 May 2014
- Posts
- 290
I have just purchased a HP DL380p Gen8 server to replace our current Dell T320 server and having already purchased, realised I'd bought the model with 8 x 2.5" bays instead of 3.5" bays...doh!
Anyway, rather than returning the server or trying to sell it (as the specs are pretty good for the price paid), I am going to suck it up and use the server as intended, however, looking at new 2.5" enterprise drives, they are incredibly expensive and seem to max out at 1.92TB.
So, I'm setting my sights on a lower overall capacity (our current server only uses about 400GB but wanted the new server to do additional tasks like backup the Windows client PC's), and so have been looking at the following drives...
Option 1: 8 x 240GB Samsung SM863a SSD's (these are used drives and costing £30 each). In RAID6, this would give me 1.4TB or in RAID10 I would get 960GB. Total cost £240.
Option 2: 4 x 480GB Samsung SM863a SSD's (these are used drives and costing £90 each). In RAID6/10 this would give me 960GB but would allow for further expansion down the road. Total cost £360.
Option 2: 8 x HPE 600GB 10k SAS drives (these are brand new and costing £45 each). I wouldn't go for RAID6 on mechanical drives so RAID10 would give me 2.4TB. Total cost £360.
Usage wise, our server acts as our Domain Controller and File Server (currently as two vms on HyperV but considering simplifying it to a single Windows Essentials setup as the server is being used purely as a way of accessing/sharing files). We often work on files about 1GB in size direct from the server and sometimes these files are really slow to open but I suspect that it as much to do with our gigabit network as anything else.
Anyway, I am just looking for opinions on which drive configuration would be best. I have also looked at Samsung EVO's which I've read of people using in server hardware but I'd rather stick to enterprise drives if possible as the server is the lifeblood of our business.
Anyway, rather than returning the server or trying to sell it (as the specs are pretty good for the price paid), I am going to suck it up and use the server as intended, however, looking at new 2.5" enterprise drives, they are incredibly expensive and seem to max out at 1.92TB.
So, I'm setting my sights on a lower overall capacity (our current server only uses about 400GB but wanted the new server to do additional tasks like backup the Windows client PC's), and so have been looking at the following drives...
Option 1: 8 x 240GB Samsung SM863a SSD's (these are used drives and costing £30 each). In RAID6, this would give me 1.4TB or in RAID10 I would get 960GB. Total cost £240.
Option 2: 4 x 480GB Samsung SM863a SSD's (these are used drives and costing £90 each). In RAID6/10 this would give me 960GB but would allow for further expansion down the road. Total cost £360.
Option 2: 8 x HPE 600GB 10k SAS drives (these are brand new and costing £45 each). I wouldn't go for RAID6 on mechanical drives so RAID10 would give me 2.4TB. Total cost £360.
Usage wise, our server acts as our Domain Controller and File Server (currently as two vms on HyperV but considering simplifying it to a single Windows Essentials setup as the server is being used purely as a way of accessing/sharing files). We often work on files about 1GB in size direct from the server and sometimes these files are really slow to open but I suspect that it as much to do with our gigabit network as anything else.
Anyway, I am just looking for opinions on which drive configuration would be best. I have also looked at Samsung EVO's which I've read of people using in server hardware but I'd rather stick to enterprise drives if possible as the server is the lifeblood of our business.