But the forum title is "Servers and Enterprise Solutions" which really is two seperate entities as someone could read that as 1) "Servers" and 2) "Enterprise Solutions"
This is also true, but again comes down to the description of "Servers", and the context in which it is used.
Given the enterprise nature of the forum (and the description thereof, which itself begins with
MID-RANGE, high-range, SANs, etc), a "Server" in this context (to me anyway) is a branded server-grade hardware node, or indeed the "server" operating systems thereof. The bold-underlined bit pretty much confirms my argument.
Whilst a node at the middle of a home LAN is sat there "serving" files (for whatever purpose), it isn't (and should never be) compared to a server in an enterprise environment, which is a different beast altogether.
In a perfect world, this sub-forum would (for argument's sake) start at a baseline of SBS, and work right up to the intricacies of failover clustered SCVMM deployments and HA applications contained within (obviously using MS products as a unit of scale rather than limiting to those products named).
The general hardware and windows & software forums are more than adequate for discussion of WHS and home-built file share machines.
A brief look at the type of threads contained here (exchange 2010 environments, active directory intricacies, etc etc) would show the intended genre for this sub-forum.