SETI

Soldato
Joined
18 Oct 2002
Posts
10,962
Location
Bristol
I was watching Horizon a few days ago, about the search of extraterrestrial life. The SETI programme was mentioned. One point of the programme was that now we are starting to discover Earth like planets we can focus the search on just those star systems. It got me thinking about all the time people had spent chewing through SETI data in the past, was this time wasted?

Perhaps more interesting is the impact on increased computer power. Just playing with some numbers here:

Say SETI at home has been running 15 years and say computer power doubles every 18 months. That gives us 10 doublings of computer power.

The interesting thing about the exponential function and such doublings is that with each doubling more work can be done in the last period than in all-time before that period. What this means in reality is that during the next 18 months, all the SETI at home work units ever analysed in the past could be analysed. Given the time, effort, energy etc that when into all that computation in the past it looks terribly bad value. We could have just waited around, done other stuff – then caught up when computers got faster.

Further complicating this is that the science now means we can be more focused and the economics also means computers are cheaper (even after counting for the doubling in performance).
 
Well since SETI still don't have any kind of persistency checking in place (looking to see where candidate signals are found in the same freuency and direction on more than one occaision) you could put a strong case that ANY work done past, present or future is a pointless excercise. But I've ground that axe before, and I'm sure some people are bored of it.

Your argument about Moores Law is a largely self defeating since while this holds it will always be better to wait another 18 months and you'd never get any work done. Much the same as you'd always be waiting to upgrade your PC - you have to bite *** bullet and invest some resources sometime.
It also ignores the less easily quantifiable benefits like greater knowledge and expertise in running DC apps, publicity and public inclusion in real science (and SETI :p)

If you consider projects other than SETI (protein folding, prime searches, signal detection etc) which have reached milestones and goals then I'm sure they'd tell you they were happy to have reached the results earlier rather than in less time.
 
Interesting thought, but you just have to start somewhere. Even if you can do more work in one year than in all past years put together, you'd still get more work done by starting as soon as possible!

I doubt I'm ever coming back to SETI from Folding, though. It was fun until I realised that all I was contributing to was global warming, my CPU temperature and the electric bill.
 
Back
Top Bottom