Struggling a bit here.
Right now I'm trying to get zpanelcp running on ubuntu server.
Followed all their instructions to the tee. Clean install of ubuntu, then "get" their package right from the terminal and install. However once installed there's nothing there?
I can ping all domain names and IPs perfectly fine. However pre-install I can ping the hostname from the LAN, but post-install it stops registering the hostname on the LAN.
If I install a bare ubuntu with LAMP I can access HTTP fine using any URI, whether it's local IP, remote IP, hostname or domainname, they all work.
Is there any Linux which installs LAMP, FTP and a light GUI that manages basic web server tasks such as FTP users?
By the way is there even any benefit for me to waste my time with Linux? I was under the impression there's less bloat and it's more efficient than Win2003, is this correct? I would rather be efficient as this isn't exactly enterprise grade equipment I'm working on, just a home project.
I know I can get a Win 2003 box fully up and running within 15-20 minutes - is there any real benefit for me to use 100-200 hours learning Linux CLI and another 200 hours fixing things which I haven't even broken?
Right now I'm trying to get zpanelcp running on ubuntu server.
Followed all their instructions to the tee. Clean install of ubuntu, then "get" their package right from the terminal and install. However once installed there's nothing there?
I can ping all domain names and IPs perfectly fine. However pre-install I can ping the hostname from the LAN, but post-install it stops registering the hostname on the LAN.
If I install a bare ubuntu with LAMP I can access HTTP fine using any URI, whether it's local IP, remote IP, hostname or domainname, they all work.
Is there any Linux which installs LAMP, FTP and a light GUI that manages basic web server tasks such as FTP users?
By the way is there even any benefit for me to waste my time with Linux? I was under the impression there's less bloat and it's more efficient than Win2003, is this correct? I would rather be efficient as this isn't exactly enterprise grade equipment I'm working on, just a home project.
I know I can get a Win 2003 box fully up and running within 15-20 minutes - is there any real benefit for me to use 100-200 hours learning Linux CLI and another 200 hours fixing things which I haven't even broken?
Last edited: