hi guys,
this won't really help with my overclocking, but i am just technically curious about why this is:
• my cpu was stable at 3.2gig, 1.4V & 400x8
• i then moved to 356x9 to move to the "9" multiplyer (since i couldn't seem to push that 400 any higher, must have hit my top end, sound about right for a DS3P?) - and it was unstable, computer kept restarting so i added a bit extra voltage and all was well...
so my question (apart from the bracketed one about the top end) is why would 400x8 require slightly less power than 356x9 when they are practically the same cpu speed? maybe running in 1:1 with the memory is more efficient or summat crazy (but interesting) like that?
this won't really help with my overclocking, but i am just technically curious about why this is:
• my cpu was stable at 3.2gig, 1.4V & 400x8
• i then moved to 356x9 to move to the "9" multiplyer (since i couldn't seem to push that 400 any higher, must have hit my top end, sound about right for a DS3P?) - and it was unstable, computer kept restarting so i added a bit extra voltage and all was well...
so my question (apart from the bracketed one about the top end) is why would 400x8 require slightly less power than 356x9 when they are practically the same cpu speed? maybe running in 1:1 with the memory is more efficient or summat crazy (but interesting) like that?