• Competitor rules

    Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.

Single thread/IPC performance since Intel 8th gen?

Soldato
Joined
26 Jan 2007
Posts
2,541
Location
Leeds
Hey folks,

Niche question, but does anyone have a good resource or even anecdotal evidence for how single threaded performance has changed over the past few years? I have an [email protected] (sort of; avx-workloads will down-clock to 4.6), and I've largely been assuming that it's not very far behind a 'modern' CPU on the ST front but... am I wrong?

Basically, I threw Cinebench r15 and r23 at it, and it's scoring like it's on stock clocks (!??), and it's significantly (40%) behind the ST scores of a stock 12th gen equivalent. Even 'just' a stock 5600X is ~30% ahead on the score board.

And it's not that I don't care about multi thread, but most of what I do responds to between 1 and 4 cores. I've been ignoring Ryzen because I didn't think it had anything to offer outside of "moar cores", but I am wondering if I'm actually just an ignorant fool who hasn't kept up with the times...

Thanks for any info!
 

Good summary, tbh, thank you :)

So a Zen 3 core on a wide range of workloads should be about 35% faster than an Intel 8th gen core, which is inline with your observation.

Great to have it confirmed, thank you ^^

Well, I might end up considering a 12th gen i5 to replace this 8th gen i7 then... same core count, a lot more performance per core. Could hit the spot in a few places :)
 
Back
Top Bottom