Associate
- Joined
- 24 Aug 2015
- Posts
- 20
Hi folks
I recently added a 128GB Samsung SM951 SSD to my system, which had previously been running a 1TB Crucial BX100 SSD as its sole drive (which has now become a games/programs drive).
Using the Crucial drive alone, Windows 8.1 was booting to the login screen faster than my monitor's startup flash screen.
Given that the Samsung should be faster, I was wondering if anyone could shed any light on why it seems to take anything from 50-100% longer to boot on a Windows 10 system?
Thanks.
EDIT: I should point out that Ultra Fast Boot was/is enabled in the BIOS in both of the above instances. Also, for reference, the BIOS time as displayed in the Task Manager is between 15-20 seconds on the rig in my signature, whereas on my ASUS Zenbook UX305 (also running Windows 10) shows a BIOS time of 2.8 seconds. Surely I should expect the more powerful computer to boot faster?
I recently added a 128GB Samsung SM951 SSD to my system, which had previously been running a 1TB Crucial BX100 SSD as its sole drive (which has now become a games/programs drive).
Using the Crucial drive alone, Windows 8.1 was booting to the login screen faster than my monitor's startup flash screen.
Given that the Samsung should be faster, I was wondering if anyone could shed any light on why it seems to take anything from 50-100% longer to boot on a Windows 10 system?
Thanks.
EDIT: I should point out that Ultra Fast Boot was/is enabled in the BIOS in both of the above instances. Also, for reference, the BIOS time as displayed in the Task Manager is between 15-20 seconds on the rig in my signature, whereas on my ASUS Zenbook UX305 (also running Windows 10) shows a BIOS time of 2.8 seconds. Surely I should expect the more powerful computer to boot faster?
Last edited: